Why is the Academy Ratio Trendy Again?

Remember how movies looked rather square back in the day? Early silent films had a boxy aspect ratio of 1.33:1. When sound entered the picture, the extra space on the film stock required the aspect ratio to be adjusted to a slightly wider (but still square looking) 1.37:1. Known as the Academy Ratio, which is often represented as “4:3,” this remained the gold standard until the 1950s. However, the rise of television (which was also very square) caused cinema to journey into a new, much wider direction. Not only did this help cinema separate itself from television, but it also enhanced the scale of the theatrical experience.

Fast forward a few decades, and these wide aspect ratios are still all the rage. In 2018, we have become accustomed to bigger and wider images through the popularity of IMAX and ultra-wide formats. However, this isn’t the case for every film. While giant blockbusters and grand epics will always remain wide, many smaller films have gravitated back towards the boxier 4:3. But why? It surely isn’t due to popular demand. The following video essay examines this question, looking at a variety of modern films shot in 4:3. You might be surprised how something so square can be so fascinating.

Watch Now: Want some great examples of how the Academy Ratio impacts a film? Then don't miss Laurence Anyways, Meek's Cutoff, and Ida all available to stream right here on Fandor!

Now that you’ve learned about the small screen, read about the (literal) biggest movies of all time and the various types of film gauges. Plus, check out our latest editorials like Is “Desperately Seeking Susan” a Feminist Film? as well as our reviews of “Bad Times at the El Royale” and “First Man.”

Видео Why is the Academy Ratio Trendy Again? канала Fandor