Ted Liu Exposes Nominee’s Own Words — Then “Correct In Part” Freezes The Hearing

Senator Ted Liu entered the hearing with documents, direct quotations, public statements, and a written judicial finding already in the record.
The exchange turned sharply when Liu read a documented public statement and asked whether the quotation was accurate. The nominee did not fully deny it. Instead, he answered with two words that became the center of the entire hearing: “correct in part.”
From there, Liu pressed deeper. He questioned the nominee about a documented repost, public claims tied to January 6, statements from former officials described as having worked directly with him, and a written finding from a sitting federal judge describing prior sworn testimony in severe terms.
The nominee repeatedly pushed back with context, disagreement, and broader framing — but Liu kept returning to the documents themselves.
This video breaks down the full exchange, the strategy behind Liu’s questioning, the meaning of “correct in part,” and why those two words may become the most important moment in the hearing.
Was Ted Liu exposing a serious gap in the record, or was the nominee being unfairly boxed in by selective quotations?
Watch the full breakdown and decide for yourself.
#tedlieu #tomhoman #uspolitics #senatehearing #congress #politicalnews

Видео Ted Liu Exposes Nominee’s Own Words — Then “Correct In Part” Freezes The Hearing канала ANALYTICAL THOUGHT