How to Analyze Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement on a Criminal Procedure Essay
LAW SCHOOL PREP
→ LEAP — 1L and 2L Video Courses (7-Day Free Trial): https://www.studicata.com/leap
→ LEAP — 1L and 2L Video Courses (Enroll Now): http://bit.ly/LEAP-ENROLL
BAR EXAM PREP
→ Free Bar Review: https://www.studicata.com/bar-review
→ Bar Review Pricing: https://www.studicata.com/bar-review-pricing
→ Uniform Bar Exam (UBE): https://www.studicata.com/ube
→ Multistate Essay Exam (MEE): https://www.studicata.com/mee
→ Multistate Bar Exam (MBE): https://www.studicata.com/mbe
→ Support Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/studicata
Have a SUCCESS STORY? We would love to hear about it. Click here to share with us: http://bit.ly/successSTORIES
How to Analyze Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement on a Criminal Procedure Essay
THE SEARCH WARRANT REQUIREMENT
Absent an exception, a government search that physically intrudes into an area where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy is unlawful UNLESS the government agent performing the search properly executes a valid search warrant.
You can think of the exceptions to the search warrant requirement as seven E.S.C.A.P.E.S. from the warrant requirement:
(E) Exigent circumstances
(S) Search incident to lawful arrest (SILA)
(C) Consent
(A) Automobiles
(P) Plain View
(E) Evidence obtained from administrative searches
(S) Stop and frisk
EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
Law enforcement officers may conduct a search without a warrant if: (1) the officers are in “hot pursuit” of a suspect; (2) the officers or public are in immediate danger; OR (3) the evidence would spoil or disappear in the time it would take to obtain a warrant.
However, a warrant is necessary for a search if the officers create the exigent circumstances.
SEARCH INCIDENT TO A LAWFUL ARREST (SILA)
Law enforcement officers may conduct a search for weapons or evidence without a warrant if the search occurs at the time that a lawful arrest is made. The scope of the search is generally limited to objects within the reach of the arrestee. If the arrest is made in a home, adjoining rooms may also be searched to ensure officer safety (i.e., other assailants that may be lying in wait).
CONSENT
Law enforcement officers may conduct a search without a warrant if a person voluntarily consents to a search. Officers do NOT have to inform the subject that she has the right to refuse consent to the search.
A third party with apparent authority can consent to search. However, officers cannot search over a present occupant’s objection (e.g., if one occupant consents and the other occupant refuses, officers cannot search the property).
AUTOMOBILES
Law enforcement officers may conduct a search without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe that an automobile contains contraband or evidence of a crime. They can search the parts of the vehicle, and containers inside, which could reasonably contain the items for which there is probable cause (e.g., cannot search for a shotgun in the glove box where it cannot reasonably fit).
PLAIN VIEW
Law enforcement officers may seize evidence without a warrant if: (1) the officers are legally on the premises; (2) the evidence is observed (with any of the five senses) in plain view; AND
(3) there is probable cause to believe the items are evidence of a crime or contraband.
ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCHES
Law enforcement officers do NOT need search warrants to conduct administrative searches if the search is both: (1) reasonable; AND (2) conducted pursuant to established police agency procedures that are designed to meet legitimate objectives while limiting the discretion of the officer. (e.g., airplane boarding areas, international borders, roadblocks for drunk drivers, etc.)
STOP AND FRISK (TERRY STOPS)
Law enforcement officers can stop an individual when the officer has a reasonable suspicion, based on articulable facts (i.e., more than a “hunch” – less than probable cause), to believe that the subject is or is about to be engaged in criminal activity.
During a Terry stop, an officer can frisk a suspect for WEAPONS without a warrant; however, the officer cannot initiate a search for EVIDENCE. If the frisk for weapons reveals objects whose shape makes their identity obvious (e.g., object is obviously contraband), the officer may seize those objects.
CONNECT WITH US
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/studicata
TWITTER: https://www.twitter.com/studicata
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/studicata
Email: info@studicata.com
Видео How to Analyze Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement on a Criminal Procedure Essay канала Studicata
→ LEAP — 1L and 2L Video Courses (7-Day Free Trial): https://www.studicata.com/leap
→ LEAP — 1L and 2L Video Courses (Enroll Now): http://bit.ly/LEAP-ENROLL
BAR EXAM PREP
→ Free Bar Review: https://www.studicata.com/bar-review
→ Bar Review Pricing: https://www.studicata.com/bar-review-pricing
→ Uniform Bar Exam (UBE): https://www.studicata.com/ube
→ Multistate Essay Exam (MEE): https://www.studicata.com/mee
→ Multistate Bar Exam (MBE): https://www.studicata.com/mbe
→ Support Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/studicata
Have a SUCCESS STORY? We would love to hear about it. Click here to share with us: http://bit.ly/successSTORIES
How to Analyze Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement on a Criminal Procedure Essay
THE SEARCH WARRANT REQUIREMENT
Absent an exception, a government search that physically intrudes into an area where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy is unlawful UNLESS the government agent performing the search properly executes a valid search warrant.
You can think of the exceptions to the search warrant requirement as seven E.S.C.A.P.E.S. from the warrant requirement:
(E) Exigent circumstances
(S) Search incident to lawful arrest (SILA)
(C) Consent
(A) Automobiles
(P) Plain View
(E) Evidence obtained from administrative searches
(S) Stop and frisk
EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
Law enforcement officers may conduct a search without a warrant if: (1) the officers are in “hot pursuit” of a suspect; (2) the officers or public are in immediate danger; OR (3) the evidence would spoil or disappear in the time it would take to obtain a warrant.
However, a warrant is necessary for a search if the officers create the exigent circumstances.
SEARCH INCIDENT TO A LAWFUL ARREST (SILA)
Law enforcement officers may conduct a search for weapons or evidence without a warrant if the search occurs at the time that a lawful arrest is made. The scope of the search is generally limited to objects within the reach of the arrestee. If the arrest is made in a home, adjoining rooms may also be searched to ensure officer safety (i.e., other assailants that may be lying in wait).
CONSENT
Law enforcement officers may conduct a search without a warrant if a person voluntarily consents to a search. Officers do NOT have to inform the subject that she has the right to refuse consent to the search.
A third party with apparent authority can consent to search. However, officers cannot search over a present occupant’s objection (e.g., if one occupant consents and the other occupant refuses, officers cannot search the property).
AUTOMOBILES
Law enforcement officers may conduct a search without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe that an automobile contains contraband or evidence of a crime. They can search the parts of the vehicle, and containers inside, which could reasonably contain the items for which there is probable cause (e.g., cannot search for a shotgun in the glove box where it cannot reasonably fit).
PLAIN VIEW
Law enforcement officers may seize evidence without a warrant if: (1) the officers are legally on the premises; (2) the evidence is observed (with any of the five senses) in plain view; AND
(3) there is probable cause to believe the items are evidence of a crime or contraband.
ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCHES
Law enforcement officers do NOT need search warrants to conduct administrative searches if the search is both: (1) reasonable; AND (2) conducted pursuant to established police agency procedures that are designed to meet legitimate objectives while limiting the discretion of the officer. (e.g., airplane boarding areas, international borders, roadblocks for drunk drivers, etc.)
STOP AND FRISK (TERRY STOPS)
Law enforcement officers can stop an individual when the officer has a reasonable suspicion, based on articulable facts (i.e., more than a “hunch” – less than probable cause), to believe that the subject is or is about to be engaged in criminal activity.
During a Terry stop, an officer can frisk a suspect for WEAPONS without a warrant; however, the officer cannot initiate a search for EVIDENCE. If the frisk for weapons reveals objects whose shape makes their identity obvious (e.g., object is obviously contraband), the officer may seize those objects.
CONNECT WITH US
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/studicata
TWITTER: https://www.twitter.com/studicata
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/studicata
Email: info@studicata.com
Видео How to Analyze Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement on a Criminal Procedure Essay канала Studicata
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
How to Analyze the Exclusionary Rule & Fruit of the Poisonous Tree on a Criminal Procedure EssayAutomobile SearchesHow to Analyze 4th Amendment Searches and Seizures of Evidence on a Criminal Procedure EssayConstitutional Law Overview: How to Issue Spot a Constitutional Law EssayWhy We Struggle Learning Languages | Gabriel Wyner | TEDxNewBedfordHow does law enforcement obtain search warrants?Fourth Amendment: Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement (Part I)Figures of Speech | Simile | Metaphor | Alliteration | Oxymoron | Antithesis | ctms |Criminal Law Bar Review: Most Tested Areas of Law on the Bar Exam [BAR BLITZ PREVIEW]How Police Get Search Warrants And What To Do About ItHow to Analyze 4th Amendment Seizures of a Person on a Criminal Procedure EssayParticularity in Search WarrantsProducts Liability — SIMPLIFIED4th Amendment Pretrial Motions to Suppress Evidence in Criminal CasesHow to Analyze Police Interrogations under Miranda v. Arizona on a Criminal Procedure EssayWhy the 4th Amendment Doesn’t Protect You Like You Think It DoesThe Fourth Amendment: The Requirement of Probable CauseHow to Analyze the Rule Against Perpetuities on Real Property Questions [PART 3/3]Most Tested Bar Exam Rules: Civil Procedure