Blueprint LSAT Logic Fails Episode 2

Blueprint LSAT presents our Logic Fails series, exposing logical reasoning flaws and logical fallacy examples in real life! Subscribe to our channel to never miss an episode!

In this episode, Blueprint instructor/tutor Robert Seaney breaks down this week’s weakest arguments in the world of sports and Twitter. He takes a look at an Ad Hominem Fallacy example and a Temporal Fallacy example.

Out of the three sections of the LSAT, the Logical Reasoning section is the one whose skills and strategies you’ll use every day, whether or not you become a lawyer. The Logical Reasoning LSAT section asks you to analyze, criticize, and breakdown different arguments, something you will likely need in everyday life!

Logic Fails aims to help you understand the different logical reasoning question types and different LSAT logical fallacies. This is the best way to sneak in some logical reasoning practice without cracking open an LSAT logical reasoning book!

Did you see or hear something this week that made your head spin because it’s so clearly flawed? Drop us a DM or use #logicfails on Twitter or Instagram and we might just cover it next week!

Looking for more help with logical reasoning questions? Check out our LSAT blog for some free LSAT prep tips and advice! https://bit.ly/3oGArVe

Looking for an LSAT class? Forget the classroom; bring class home with you with Live Online: https://bit.ly/2GdiGeM

Need a more flexible schedule? Study on your terms with our online on-demand LSAT Course, Online Anytime: https://bit.ly/3mC4Xh3

Want one-on-one help? Working with a private LSAT tutor can help you reach your goal score! https://bit.ly/31XZgSY

Видео Blueprint LSAT Logic Fails Episode 2 канала Blueprint LSAT Preparation