Schooling Megan Fox
Today we’ll be discussing neanderthals, penises, and dragons. Yes, really.
NOTE- when I compare humans and Neanderthals, I am referring to modern humans VS Neanderthals. We are all Hominids, but my convention was that humans (homo sapiens) are a subset of Hominids, just like Neanderthals.
CORRECTION ABOUT THE NEANDERTHAL DNA:
I apparently misread the graph, taking the y-axis to mean "percentage of DNA differences" when it's actually something a bit more subtle. Neanderthals and humans DO have more DNA in common than do humans and chimps. That said, the data still fucks this lady's argument because the graph DOES show, from the x-axis, that human-to-human sets have much fewer variations among their DNA than do human-to-Neanderthal sets. Sorry for the hiccup ;O
The video that I’m responding to is pretty long, and the saturation of nonsense in that video is toxic- indeed, after wading through only half her feature, I’d written about ten pages for the first draft of this video’s script before deciding that I was just going to talk about some of my favorite parts. If you make a video response to her, please let me know- if it’s funny and informative, you might get a shout-out in my next video :)
Her video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32mxZxv3dYM&list=UU9XP_Ax4_vTi1IqSSRD9ORQ
The paper I cited:
http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(08)00773-3
If you didn’t like this video, please follow these instructions:
http://www.jokideo.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/What-to-do-with-your-opinion.png
Видео Schooling Megan Fox канала King Crocoduck
NOTE- when I compare humans and Neanderthals, I am referring to modern humans VS Neanderthals. We are all Hominids, but my convention was that humans (homo sapiens) are a subset of Hominids, just like Neanderthals.
CORRECTION ABOUT THE NEANDERTHAL DNA:
I apparently misread the graph, taking the y-axis to mean "percentage of DNA differences" when it's actually something a bit more subtle. Neanderthals and humans DO have more DNA in common than do humans and chimps. That said, the data still fucks this lady's argument because the graph DOES show, from the x-axis, that human-to-human sets have much fewer variations among their DNA than do human-to-Neanderthal sets. Sorry for the hiccup ;O
The video that I’m responding to is pretty long, and the saturation of nonsense in that video is toxic- indeed, after wading through only half her feature, I’d written about ten pages for the first draft of this video’s script before deciding that I was just going to talk about some of my favorite parts. If you make a video response to her, please let me know- if it’s funny and informative, you might get a shout-out in my next video :)
Her video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32mxZxv3dYM&list=UU9XP_Ax4_vTi1IqSSRD9ORQ
The paper I cited:
http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(08)00773-3
If you didn’t like this video, please follow these instructions:
http://www.jokideo.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/What-to-do-with-your-opinion.png
Видео Schooling Megan Fox канала King Crocoduck
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Santa's Apologetics3rd Eric Hovind Commentary (4/4)4th Eric Hovind Commentary (3/4)Symphony of PsychosConfronting AnswerQuestions1MOAR SHOUTOUTSThe Arrogance of Creationism (4)2nd Eric Hovind Commentary (3/4)Scholarly Academic Debate Challenge to Jason Burns3rd Eric Hovind Commentary (3/4)1st Eric Hovind Commentary (2/4)Ray Comfort Thinks Eclipses are MAGIC!4th Eric Hovind Commentary (1/4)Bastardizing Empiricism | The Science WarsUnfortunately For You, However...2nd Eric Hovind Commentary (2/4)The Arrogance of Creationism (5)1st Eric Hovind Commentary (4/4)5 Signs that Josh Feuerstein is an Ass4th Eric Hovind Commentary (2/4)2nd Eric Hovind Commentary (4/4)