Efficiently Perform Set-Difference with Multiple Set Arguments in Common Lisp

Learn how to extend the `set-difference` function in Common Lisp to support multiple set arguments, improving efficiency and effectiveness!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66496109/ asked by the user 'davypough' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7016092/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66496309/ provided by the user 'Barmar' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1491895/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Performing set-difference with Multiple Set Arguments

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Efficiently Perform Set-Difference with Multiple Set Arguments in Common Lisp

When working with sets in programming, one common operation is finding the difference between two or more sets. In Common Lisp, the built-in function set-difference strictly allows the calculation of the difference between two sets. This limitation can be cumbersome, especially when one needs to find the difference among multiple sets, such as (my-set-difference A B C)—similar to how subtraction handles multiple arguments like (- 9 3 1) yielding 5. So, how can we efficiently extend set-difference for multiple set arguments without hitting performance issues?

Understanding the Problem

The core issue lies in the way set-difference is designed. When we attempt to use a method like (reduce # 'set-difference ...) to handle multiple sets, we often encounter inefficiency. This is primarily because reduce will first require all the set arguments to be collected into a sequence, which adds an unnecessary overhead in processing time and memory usage. The objective is to find a more effective way of achieving the same result, especially when dealing with a number of sets.

A Solution: Concatenating Sets for Efficiency

The most efficient way to extend the set-difference function for more than two sets involves appending all but the first set together and then performing the difference operation. Here’s a breakdown of how and why this works:

Step 1: Understand the Operations

Complexity Analysis:

The time complexity for each call set-difference is O(n), where n is the maximum size of the two sets being compared.

Utilizing reduce results in a complexity of O(n*m), with m being the total number of sets you'd like to compare.

Step 2: Implement the Solution

Instead of relying on reduce, we can concatenate all the sets except for the first one. Here’s how you can do this:

Append Other Sets:

Use the append function to collect all sets except the first.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Evaluate Complexity:

The time complexity for this operation is simplified. Appending all the additional sets takes O(total length of B, C, D, ...), and the subsequent set-difference operation will only add a similar complexity.

Example Code

Here’s a simple example demonstrating how to implement this in Common Lisp:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of This Approach

Enhanced Efficiency: By avoiding multiple calls to set-difference through reduction, you significantly decrease operational overhead.

Simplicity: This method keeps the code cleaner, as you can handle multiple sets seamlessly without complex recursive structures.

Conclusion

Extending the set-difference functionality to work with multiple sets in Common Lisp can simplify your code and improve performance. By implementing a strategy that utilizes appending for efficiency, you can achieve the results you desire without the drawbacks of the standard approach. This is just one of many ways to leverage the elegance of Common Lisp to manage sets effectively.

Implement this method in your next project, and notice the difference in performance and clarity when handling multiple set operations!

Видео Efficiently Perform Set-Difference with Multiple Set Arguments in Common Lisp канала vlogize