Understanding Numba Parallel Time Per Thread Usage in Python

Explore why using more threads in Numba can slow down performance. Understand the limitations of memory-bound operations in Python and tips to optimize your code.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72756574/ asked by the user 'ABZANMASTER' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19070211/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72757837/ provided by the user 'Jérôme Richard' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12939557/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Numba parallel time per thread usage in python

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Numba Parallel Time Per Thread Usage in Python

When using Numba for parallel processing in Python, many developers have noticed an intriguing phenomenon: the performance gain diminishes after a certain number of threads. Specifically, while performance improves with an increased number of threads up to a point, it can unexpectedly drop when exceeding that threshold. In this post, we will delve into the reasons behind this behavior and what you can do about it.

The Problem: Why More Threads May Slow Down Your Code

As shown in a user’s test, using Numba with multiple threads can lead to slower execution times after a certain level of concurrency. In tests run on a machine with 8 cores and 16 threads, the performance peaked at around 5 threads, but subsequent additions didn’t yield any benefit and even led to worse performance. The key points to understand include:

Memory Bandwidth Limitation: The article emphasizes that operations within the code are memory-bound. This means that the speed of the program is limited not by the CPU's computational power, but by its ability to read and write data to memory.

Cache Policy Effects: Each arithmetic operation might involve multiple memory accesses. In the example code, every multiplication operation leads to several reads and writes in memory (32 bytes of data processed per loop iteration), which puts pressure on memory bandwidth.

Processor Speed vs. RAM Speed: Modern processors can perform double-precision calculations much faster than RAM can supply the data needed for those calculations. This discrepancy is known as the Memory Wall, where the progress of RAM speed is outpaced by the advancement in computing power.

The Solution: Optimizing Your Code in Numba

To mitigate the issues associated with memory-bound operations in Numba, consider implementing the following strategies:

1. Reduce Memory Accesses

You can optimize your code by reducing the number of memory accesses needed:

Aim to perform multiple computations on a single piece of data before loading it from memory again.

Try to restructure loops or use intermediate variables to split operations for better cache utilization.

2. Use Smaller Data Blocks

Instead of processing large blocks of data at a time, break down the data into smaller chunks. This helps to minimize memory pressure and allows more effective caching:

Create a function to process sub-arrays of your data sequentially.

Ensure that the operations within those sub-arrays are optimized for parallel execution.

3. Consider Alternative Implementations

If you're comfortable with languages such as C or C+ + , consider rewriting performance-critical sections in those languages. They can often provide more control over memory management:

C/C+ + can allow some operations to skip unnecessary write-allocation, yielding improved performance.

Use library bindings that interface C/C+ + with Numba for enhanced performance.

Conclusion

The phenomenon of diminishing returns with increasing threads in Numba is largely due to the challenges posed by memory bandwidth. Understanding this can help you make smarter design decisions when coding parallel processes. By optimizing memory access, managing data efficiently, and considering alternative implementations, you can significantly enhance the performance of your applications. Despite the inherent limitations of current hardware, employing these techniques might just give your project the performance boost it needs.

If you face similar issues or have insights on this topic, feel free to share your experiences or questions in the comments below!

Видео Understanding Numba Parallel Time Per Thread Usage in Python канала vlogize