- Популярные видео
- Авто
- Видео-блоги
- ДТП, аварии
- Для маленьких
- Еда, напитки
- Животные
- Закон и право
- Знаменитости
- Игры
- Искусство
- Комедии
- Красота, мода
- Кулинария, рецепты
- Люди
- Мото
- Музыка
- Мультфильмы
- Наука, технологии
- Новости
- Образование
- Политика
- Праздники
- Приколы
- Природа
- Происшествия
- Путешествия
- Развлечения
- Ржач
- Семья
- Сериалы
- Спорт
- Стиль жизни
- ТВ передачи
- Танцы
- Технологии
- Товары
- Ужасы
- Фильмы
- Шоу-бизнес
- Юмор
WHERE IS MR. KEJRIWAL? HC JUDGE BIG ACTION......KEJRIWAL TO MOVE SC SOON ? #supremecourtofindia
Can the Government suspend a political party’s Instagram handle without a clear statutory power?
And can a politician boycott a courtroom while simultaneously asking the Supreme Court to transfer the same judge from hearing his case?
This week, the Aam Aadmi Party raised both questions in two different constitutional courtrooms.
In the Supreme Court, AAP challenged the suspension of its Gujarat unit’s Instagram handle, arguing that Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act was never meant to become a direct content-blocking weapon. Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat argued that the provision only deals with “safe harbour” obligations of intermediaries — not independent censorship powers.
The party says the move violates Article 19(1)(a), the constitutional guarantee of free speech. The Supreme Court has now issued notice to the Centre.
At the same time in the Delhi High Court, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma appointed three amicus curiae for Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Satyendar Jain after the leaders chose to boycott proceedings, invoking “Mahatma Gandhi’s Satyagraha principles” and claiming their faith in the court process had been shaken.
But here’s the constitutional twist:
Kejriwal had also moved the Supreme Court seeking transfer of the excise policy case away from Justice Sharma’s bench — even as his legal team withdrew from participation before her court.
This has now created a rare constitutional confrontation involving:
⚖️ Article 19 vs state regulation of digital speech
⚖️ Article 21 vs procedural fairness in criminal prosecution
⚖️ Judicial recusal vs courtroom boycott
⚖️ Free speech, due process, and strategic constitutional litigation
Justice Sharma’s response may become one of the most significant procedural moments in the case: instead of proceeding ex parte, she chose to appoint independent senior advocates as amicus curiae to preserve procedural fairness.
And one line from the Supreme Court hearing may define this entire battle:
“Today my portal is gone.”
Because this is no longer just about an Instagram account.
It is about whether opposition parties in India can lose their digital voice overnight — and what constitutional remedy exists when that happens.
#SupremeCourt #AAP #ArvindKejriwal #DelhiHighCourt #InstagramBan #FreedomOfSpeech #Article19 #Article21 #ITAct #Constitution #LegalNews #IndianJudiciary #ShadanFarasat #SwaranaKantaSharma #LawChakra #BreakingNews
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For promotions and Collaborations reach us on- enquire@lawchakra.in
Follow us on Twitter:- https://twitter.com/LawChakra
Follow us on Whatsapp : https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaP5t4bEquiTbSG4LV0n
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWTCQQbEvdIMbyW3g_EU43w/join
Visit Our Website:- https://lawchakra.in/
Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
Books on Constitution:- https://amzn.to/3rqFpbh
Tools Used for editing:-
1. https://amzn.to/3EelR1r
2. https://amzn.to/3TWe6o7
For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
@Lawchakra
👉Twitter
https://twitter.com/LawChakra
👉 Instagram.
https://www.instagram.com/lawchakra/
📑*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
Видео WHERE IS MR. KEJRIWAL? HC JUDGE BIG ACTION......KEJRIWAL TO MOVE SC SOON ? #supremecourtofindia канала Law Chakra
And can a politician boycott a courtroom while simultaneously asking the Supreme Court to transfer the same judge from hearing his case?
This week, the Aam Aadmi Party raised both questions in two different constitutional courtrooms.
In the Supreme Court, AAP challenged the suspension of its Gujarat unit’s Instagram handle, arguing that Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act was never meant to become a direct content-blocking weapon. Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat argued that the provision only deals with “safe harbour” obligations of intermediaries — not independent censorship powers.
The party says the move violates Article 19(1)(a), the constitutional guarantee of free speech. The Supreme Court has now issued notice to the Centre.
At the same time in the Delhi High Court, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma appointed three amicus curiae for Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Satyendar Jain after the leaders chose to boycott proceedings, invoking “Mahatma Gandhi’s Satyagraha principles” and claiming their faith in the court process had been shaken.
But here’s the constitutional twist:
Kejriwal had also moved the Supreme Court seeking transfer of the excise policy case away from Justice Sharma’s bench — even as his legal team withdrew from participation before her court.
This has now created a rare constitutional confrontation involving:
⚖️ Article 19 vs state regulation of digital speech
⚖️ Article 21 vs procedural fairness in criminal prosecution
⚖️ Judicial recusal vs courtroom boycott
⚖️ Free speech, due process, and strategic constitutional litigation
Justice Sharma’s response may become one of the most significant procedural moments in the case: instead of proceeding ex parte, she chose to appoint independent senior advocates as amicus curiae to preserve procedural fairness.
And one line from the Supreme Court hearing may define this entire battle:
“Today my portal is gone.”
Because this is no longer just about an Instagram account.
It is about whether opposition parties in India can lose their digital voice overnight — and what constitutional remedy exists when that happens.
#SupremeCourt #AAP #ArvindKejriwal #DelhiHighCourt #InstagramBan #FreedomOfSpeech #Article19 #Article21 #ITAct #Constitution #LegalNews #IndianJudiciary #ShadanFarasat #SwaranaKantaSharma #LawChakra #BreakingNews
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For promotions and Collaborations reach us on- enquire@lawchakra.in
Follow us on Twitter:- https://twitter.com/LawChakra
Follow us on Whatsapp : https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaP5t4bEquiTbSG4LV0n
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWTCQQbEvdIMbyW3g_EU43w/join
Visit Our Website:- https://lawchakra.in/
Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
Books on Constitution:- https://amzn.to/3rqFpbh
Tools Used for editing:-
1. https://amzn.to/3EelR1r
2. https://amzn.to/3TWe6o7
For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
@Lawchakra
https://twitter.com/LawChakra
👉 Instagram.
https://www.instagram.com/lawchakra/
📑*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
Видео WHERE IS MR. KEJRIWAL? HC JUDGE BIG ACTION......KEJRIWAL TO MOVE SC SOON ? #supremecourtofindia канала Law Chakra
high court live India supreme court Associates legal fact in india law classes online crpc ipc live court view contempt of court judge angry gujarat high court Law Chakra Patna high court live High Court live corruption PM MOdi Narendra Modi Legal LawChakra Law CHakra Law NEws High Court Supreme Court of India Supreme COurt Chief Justice of India Supreme COurt Live SUpreme Court of India Supreme COurt of India Live CJi DY Chandrachud
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
8 мая 2026 г. 18:08:30
00:08:03
Другие видео канала


















