Cohen v. California Summary | quimbee.com
A video case brief of Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971). Read the full-text brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/cohen-v-california
The Los Angeles Municipal Court convicted Robert Cohen (defendant) for violating the state penal code prohibiting “maliciously and willfully disturbing the peace or quiet of any neighborhood or person by offensive conduct.” He was convicted after wearing a jacket bearing the words “Fuck the Draft.” Women and children were present. Cohen argued that he wore the jacket as a means of expressing the depth of his feelings toward the Vietnam War and the draft. He did not engage in any threatening conduct in conjunction with this speech. Cohen challenged his conviction on First Amendment grounds against the State of California (plaintiff), but the California Court of Appeal upheld the conviction. The Supreme Court of California denied review, but the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Видео Cohen v. California Summary | quimbee.com канала Quimbee
The Los Angeles Municipal Court convicted Robert Cohen (defendant) for violating the state penal code prohibiting “maliciously and willfully disturbing the peace or quiet of any neighborhood or person by offensive conduct.” He was convicted after wearing a jacket bearing the words “Fuck the Draft.” Women and children were present. Cohen argued that he wore the jacket as a means of expressing the depth of his feelings toward the Vietnam War and the draft. He did not engage in any threatening conduct in conjunction with this speech. Cohen challenged his conviction on First Amendment grounds against the State of California (plaintiff), but the California Court of Appeal upheld the conviction. The Supreme Court of California denied review, but the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Видео Cohen v. California Summary | quimbee.com канала Quimbee
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Printz v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission Summary | quimbee.comDo Students Have Free Speech in School? | Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictProtecting Whistleblowers | New York Times Co. v. United StatesRegents of University of California v. Bakke Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedChimel v. California Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedCan the Police Use Evidence They Got Illegally? | Mapp v. OhioMapp v. Ohio [SCOTUSbrief]FIRE Starters: Cohen v. CaliforniaTexas v. Johnson Summary | quimbee.comHammer v. Dagenhart Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedLucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council Summary | quimbee.comTennessee v GarnerMiranda v. Arizona Summary | quimbee.comCan Your Religion Get You Out of School? | Wisconsin v. YoderPlanned Parenthood v. Casey Summary | quimbee.comSchenck v. United States | BRI's Homework Help SeriesMarbury v. Madison (1803) | Judicial Review Is EstablishedCentronics Corporation v. Genicom Corporation Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained