ताजमहल के नीचे मिला शिव मंदिर का सबूत - विज्ञानिक के उड़े होश - इतिहास फिर से लिखा जायेगा

ताजमहल के नीचे मिला शिव मंदिर का सबूत - विज्ञानिक के उड़े होश - इतिहास फिर से लिखा जायेगा
P.N. Oak stated that Taj Mahal should be viewed as a temple palace and not as a tomb. He even goes on to say that Mumtaz Mahal is not even buried there. According to him, all the records of the Taj Mahal are just instruments to hide its true origin. To prove his claim, he even filed a petition in the court for permission to break open the cenotaphs, and to tear down brick walls in the basement chambers to prove his case. However, his case was rejected by the court as no hardcore evidence was there to support the claim. But many researchers continue to believe in it and the legend lives on

#tajmahal #mystery #temple #unsolved

The term Tajmahal itself never occurs in any mughal court paper or chronicle even till Aurangzeb’s era. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.

The ending “Mahal” is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as “Mahal”.

The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects. First, her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani. And second, one cannot omit the first three letters “Mum” from a woman’s name to derive the remainder as the name of the building.

Since the lady’s name was Mumtaz (ending with ‘Z’) the name of the building derived from her should have been Taz Mahal, if at all, and not Taj (spelled with a ‘J’).

Several European visitors of Shahjahan’s time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal. It is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave.

The tomb should be understood to signify NOT A BUILDING but only the grave or centotaph inside it. This would help people to realize that all dead muslim courtiers and royalty including Humayun, Akbar, Mumtaz, Etmad-ud-Daula and Safdarjang have been buried in capture Hindu mansions and temples.

If the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term Mahal, i.e., mansion apply to it?

8.Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mughal courts it is absurd to search for any mughal explanation for it. Both its components namely, ‘Taj’ and’ Mahal’ are of Sanskrit origin

Видео ताजमहल के नीचे मिला शिव मंदिर का सबूत - विज्ञानिक के उड़े होश - इतिहास फिर से लिखा जायेगा канала Adbhut Tv India