Mathematician Debunks Bill Nye: Proving God/Creationism with Math?! | Interview with Dr. Jason Lisle
Do NUMBERS prove that GOD exists? Dr. Jason Lisle, founder of the Biblical Science Institute, is known for his work in astronomy. However, he also studied mathematics at Ohio Wesleyan University. Using his knowledge of mathematics and his keen logic, Dr. Lisle makes a fascinating case that, not only does the applicability of mathematics and the reality of mathematical laws only make sense in the Christian worldview, but that numbers themselves prove the existence of God! Find out about a SECRET CODE hidden within numbers that points to the divine and why Bill Nye's numbers on population genetics do not support the evolutionary theory. We've got genetics, theology, secret codes, mind-boggling equations and Jason Lisle in one video! You owe it to yourself to see this one!
Podcast:
https://www.christjesusministriesllc.com/podcasts
Equipment Used:
https://kit.co/ChristJesusMinistries
Credits |
Writer: Christopher Sernaque
Presenter: Christopher Sernaque
Camera Operator: Casey Sernaque
Audio Manager: Casey Sernaque
Editor: Casey Sernaque
Disclaimer: Christ Jesus Ministries deeply respects and admires the work of the Biblical Science Institute and Creation Ministries International. In this interview, we asked Dr. Lisle, of BSI, to review Shaun Doyle’s comments on Nash’s argument. Shaun’s comment are used by permission and, as Shaun said in his second email, his comment “doesn't necessarily reflect those (views) of CMI as a whole.” Dr. Lisle gave feedback on Shaun Doyle’s comment, but it is not the case whatsoever that Dr. Lisle has personal animus against Shaun Doyle or Creation Ministries International. To the contrary, Dr. Lisle, and Christ Jesus Ministries, respect the work of Shaun Doyle as a person and CMI as a ministry:
Hi Christopher,
It's been awhile since we last conversed. Sure, there's no problems with you using what I wrote. So you know, though, my assessment of the argument from numbers is my personal view of the argument, and doesn't necessarily reflect those of CMI as a whole (for instance, we do reference it positively here: https://creation.com/atheism#nash-numbers).
Also, I'd probably say things less certainly now than I did back in 2018. There may be ways around some problems with divine conceptualism (see e.g. https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/questions-about-god-and-abstract-objects/). But it's almost an a priori presumption for me now that one shouldn't conflate semantics/linguistics and ontology. That's my main motivation for being an anti-realist about mathematical objects. But I get that other people just see things differently. So, I might still float a conceptualist argument for God as something for them to consider. I'd probably make clear that it doesn't convince me, but only because I'm an anti-realist about mathematical objects. If I were a realist about them, it probably would appeal to me. For instance, think about the link between the physical, mental, and mathematical in the argument for God from the usefulness of maths in science. It seems that the best case for an ultimate source for the whole scenario is a divine mind. So, if mathematical objects were real, they, like the physical world itself, would find their source in God.
Kind regards,
Shaun
Links talked about:
https://biblicalscienceinstitute.com/dr-lisle/
https://creation.com/dr-jason-lisle
https://answersingenesis.org/bios/jason-lisle/
https://www.icr.org/article/introducing-icrs-new-director-research/
https://creationtoday.org/bill-nye-uf/
https://creation.com/atheism
https://creation.com/arguments-for-god
https://creation.com/god-in-math
https://creation.com/golden-numbers
AIG Numbers:
https://answersingenesis.org/mathematics/fractals/
ICR Numbers:
https://www.icr.org/content/taf42
Jason Lisle Secret Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzKY1pzZECA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEyPWJVYp84
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcVcATp_txQ
Видео Mathematician Debunks Bill Nye: Proving God/Creationism with Math?! | Interview with Dr. Jason Lisle канала Christ Jesus Ministries
Podcast:
https://www.christjesusministriesllc.com/podcasts
Equipment Used:
https://kit.co/ChristJesusMinistries
Credits |
Writer: Christopher Sernaque
Presenter: Christopher Sernaque
Camera Operator: Casey Sernaque
Audio Manager: Casey Sernaque
Editor: Casey Sernaque
Disclaimer: Christ Jesus Ministries deeply respects and admires the work of the Biblical Science Institute and Creation Ministries International. In this interview, we asked Dr. Lisle, of BSI, to review Shaun Doyle’s comments on Nash’s argument. Shaun’s comment are used by permission and, as Shaun said in his second email, his comment “doesn't necessarily reflect those (views) of CMI as a whole.” Dr. Lisle gave feedback on Shaun Doyle’s comment, but it is not the case whatsoever that Dr. Lisle has personal animus against Shaun Doyle or Creation Ministries International. To the contrary, Dr. Lisle, and Christ Jesus Ministries, respect the work of Shaun Doyle as a person and CMI as a ministry:
Hi Christopher,
It's been awhile since we last conversed. Sure, there's no problems with you using what I wrote. So you know, though, my assessment of the argument from numbers is my personal view of the argument, and doesn't necessarily reflect those of CMI as a whole (for instance, we do reference it positively here: https://creation.com/atheism#nash-numbers).
Also, I'd probably say things less certainly now than I did back in 2018. There may be ways around some problems with divine conceptualism (see e.g. https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/questions-about-god-and-abstract-objects/). But it's almost an a priori presumption for me now that one shouldn't conflate semantics/linguistics and ontology. That's my main motivation for being an anti-realist about mathematical objects. But I get that other people just see things differently. So, I might still float a conceptualist argument for God as something for them to consider. I'd probably make clear that it doesn't convince me, but only because I'm an anti-realist about mathematical objects. If I were a realist about them, it probably would appeal to me. For instance, think about the link between the physical, mental, and mathematical in the argument for God from the usefulness of maths in science. It seems that the best case for an ultimate source for the whole scenario is a divine mind. So, if mathematical objects were real, they, like the physical world itself, would find their source in God.
Kind regards,
Shaun
Links talked about:
https://biblicalscienceinstitute.com/dr-lisle/
https://creation.com/dr-jason-lisle
https://answersingenesis.org/bios/jason-lisle/
https://www.icr.org/article/introducing-icrs-new-director-research/
https://creationtoday.org/bill-nye-uf/
https://creation.com/atheism
https://creation.com/arguments-for-god
https://creation.com/god-in-math
https://creation.com/golden-numbers
AIG Numbers:
https://answersingenesis.org/mathematics/fractals/
ICR Numbers:
https://www.icr.org/content/taf42
Jason Lisle Secret Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzKY1pzZECA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEyPWJVYp84
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcVcATp_txQ
Видео Mathematician Debunks Bill Nye: Proving God/Creationism with Math?! | Interview with Dr. Jason Lisle канала Christ Jesus Ministries
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
6 февраля 2021 г. 18:30:02
00:53:00
Другие видео канала
![Andrew Wiles - The Abel Prize interview 2016](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cWKAzX5U85Q/default.jpg)
![Pure Talk | Answering Atheists with Dr. Jason Lisle](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/UzKY1pzZECA/default.jpg)
![The Ultimate Proof of Creation - Dr. Jason Lisle](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aQ_UxcV-xcM/default.jpg)
![The Secret Code of Creation: Dr. Jason Lisle](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/taKaFUNJ6Ec/default.jpg)
![The Secret Code of Creation - Dr. Jason Lisle](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kEyPWJVYp84/default.jpg)
![Q&A: Dr. Jason Lisle Science confirms Biblical Creation & Biblical Authority](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MGJGyExh6mI/default.jpg)
![God, Math, and the Multiverse | Satyan Devadoss](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mrWyj34WGFE/default.jpg)
![Dr Jason Lisle Interview](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KFE925VIaRg/default.jpg)
![Dr. David Berlinski: The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0XIDykeZplU/default.jpg)
![Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OVEuQg_Mglw/default.jpg)
![Aliens and UFOs | Eric Hovind and Dr. Jason Lisle](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SjACDBsBCGM/default.jpg)
![Refuting Popular Claims Against Intelligent Design: God's Return? | Interview with Dr. Stephen Meyer](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bKPe7w-iPu0/default.jpg)
![Creation Evangelism - Dr Jason Lisle](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-tm7xucqx98/default.jpg)
![Is Young Earth Creationism Biblically Problematic?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kUhpISXuq1w/default.jpg)
![Big Bang: Exploding the Myth 💥 with Dr. Terry Mortenson](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_V58ma6ykP0/default.jpg)
![Dr. Jason Lisle Interview: Where Do Craters Fit in the Biblical Creationism Model?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DpPcY1s9Gjo/default.jpg)
![Science Confirms Biblical Creation - Dr. Jason Lisle](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0qjrTSra0pQ/default.jpg)
![Understanding Genesis with Dr. Jason Lisle](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sNM2UBecM9M/default.jpg)
![The Historical Adam](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DN3-USYpkmk/default.jpg)
![Secrets of the Cosmos that Confirm the Bible - Dr. Jason Lisle](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/afXQomQ7Gqo/default.jpg)