New York Times Co. v. Sullivan: A Landmark Case for Free Speech [No. 86]
Are political ads protected under the First Amendment? In this episode of No. 86, Professor Eugene Volokh of the UCLA School of Law explains how New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), a landmark Supreme Court case, transformed our understanding of libel law.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Follow the Eugene Volokh on Twitter: @VolokhC
https://twitter.com/VolokhC
Related Links:
Oyez: New York Times v. Sullivan
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1963/39
DC Bar: Window to the Past: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
https://www.dcbar.org/bar-resources/publications/washington-lawyer/articles/october-2014-nyt-sullivan.cfm
ABA Journal: 50 years after New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, do courts still value journalists’ watchdog role?
http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/50_years_after_new_york_times_v._sullivan_do_courts_still_value_journalists
Washington Post: Antonin Scalia hates ‘NYT v. Sullivan’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2012/12/04/antonin-scalia-hates-nyt-v-sullivan/?utm_term=.abd3f7dddc6f
The Atlantic: The Civil Rights Heroes the Court Ignored in New York Times v. Sullivan
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/03/the-civil-rights-heroes-the-court-ignored-in-em-new-york-times-v-sullivan-em/284550/
Chicago Unbound: Was New York Times v. Sullivan Wrong?
http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2295&context=journal_articles
Видео New York Times Co. v. Sullivan: A Landmark Case for Free Speech [No. 86] канала The Federalist Society
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Follow the Eugene Volokh on Twitter: @VolokhC
https://twitter.com/VolokhC
Related Links:
Oyez: New York Times v. Sullivan
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1963/39
DC Bar: Window to the Past: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
https://www.dcbar.org/bar-resources/publications/washington-lawyer/articles/october-2014-nyt-sullivan.cfm
ABA Journal: 50 years after New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, do courts still value journalists’ watchdog role?
http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/50_years_after_new_york_times_v._sullivan_do_courts_still_value_journalists
Washington Post: Antonin Scalia hates ‘NYT v. Sullivan’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2012/12/04/antonin-scalia-hates-nyt-v-sullivan/?utm_term=.abd3f7dddc6f
The Atlantic: The Civil Rights Heroes the Court Ignored in New York Times v. Sullivan
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/03/the-civil-rights-heroes-the-court-ignored-in-em-new-york-times-v-sullivan-em/284550/
Chicago Unbound: Was New York Times v. Sullivan Wrong?
http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2295&context=journal_articles
Видео New York Times Co. v. Sullivan: A Landmark Case for Free Speech [No. 86] канала The Federalist Society
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
NY Times v. Sullivan (Defamation) - Landmark Cases - Episode # 9Is Gerrymandering Legal? | Shaw v. RenoDo Students Have Free Speech in School? | Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictCan the Police Use Evidence They Got Illegally? | Mapp v. OhioWhat Were the Pentagon Papers? | HistoryThe Amistad Case | "Give us Free"Going to Prison For Criticizing the Government | Debs v. United StatesMapp v. Ohio [SCOTUSbrief]Schenck vs United States Explained in 5 Minutes: US History ReviewBrandenburg v. Ohio Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedFreedom of Speech - Landmark Cases - Episode # 3Brady BasicsWhy You Get a Lawyer If You Can't Afford One | Gideon v. WainwrightCan Your Religion Get You Out of School? | Wisconsin v. YoderMcDonald v. Chicago | Homework Help from the Bill of Rights InstituteUS Supreme Court Decision: New York Times v. SullivanTinker v. Des Moines | Homework Help from the Bill of Rights InstituteNear vs MinnesotaFLETC Talks - Katz v. US