How to Implement C+ + Iterator Arguments in an Abstract Class

Discover clean and effective solutions for handling iterator arguments in abstract classes in `C+ + `, including static polymorphism and pointer usage for enhanced performance.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/69814585/ asked by the user 'yannick818' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13804572/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/69826545/ provided by the user 'passing_through' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12816539/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: C+ + iterator argument in abstract class

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Handling C+ + Iterator Arguments in an Abstract Class

When developing applications in C+ + , you might find yourself dealing with abstract classes that handle reading and writing data. A common requirement is to have methods that accept iterators as arguments, allowing for flexibility and code reuse. However, dealing with templates and abstract classes can often pose challenges, especially since you cannot declare virtual template methods.

In this post, we will dive into your options for effectively implementing iterator arguments within an abstract class and discuss two preferred approaches that make use of C+ + features.

The Problem

You are looking to implement the following abstract class structure with templated iterator types for read and write operations:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, given the limitations of C+ + , you cannot create virtual template methods. This prompts you to consider two possible solutions:

Eliminate the abstract class and utilize a template instead.

Make the abstract class itself a template and pass the iterator type.

Is either of these solutions a clean and efficient way to handle this requirement?

Effective Solutions

Solution 1: Embrace Static Polymorphism

The recommended approach is to use static polymorphism instead of relying on virtual functions. By using templates, you're able to pass different types directly without the need for virtual tables, which can enhance performance and reduce overhead.

Implementation

If your abstract class is just serving as an interface, consider eliminating it and implementing your read and write functions directly in your implementation classes:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You can then replace usages of your implementation classes with the following:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

If your abstract class is meant to maintain some logic or data for inheritance purposes, you can keep it but avoid using any virtual functions:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Solution 2: Use Raw Pointer Parameters

An alternative approach is to simplify the iterator usage by directly using raw pointers, especially if your iterators can often be reduced to a raw array context. This strategy minimizes overhead and keeps the implementation straightforward:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This solution is particularly effective for scenarios where performance is critical and the complexity of template usage can be avoided.

Conclusion

By approaching the challenge of handling C+ + iterator arguments with either static polymorphism or raw pointers, you can achieve a clean and effective solution for your abstract class design. Choosing the right method depends on your specific use case and whether the class needs to maintain shared logic or simply serves as a functional interface.

Now that you have a better understanding of these strategies, you can confidently implement iterator arguments in your C+ + projects!

Видео How to Implement C+ + Iterator Arguments in an Abstract Class канала vlogize