2019 Suzuki Jimny - Crash Test
ADULT OCCUPANT
Comments
In the frontal offset test, there was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent it from 'bottoming out', allowing the head to contact the steering wheel. The score for the head was penalised for the behaviour of the airbag and the displacement of the steering wheel, and protection for this part of the body was rated as marginal. The passenger compartment was extensively deformed in the offset test, especially around the door-frame and the score for the driver's chest was penalised for this unstable collapse. Combined with marginal dummy readings, protection for this body area was rated as weak. Although dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger, structures in the instrument panel and dashboard were thought to pose a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes, and protection was rated as marginal. In the full-width, rigid-barrier impact protection of the head of the rear passenger dummy was rated as weak, based on dummy readings during the test and protection of the chest of both driver and rear passenger was marginal. Tests on the front seats and head restraints showed marginal protection against whiplash injury in a rear impact. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused. However, the Jimny did not qualify for these points as Euro NCAP requires good head restraint performance as a pre-requisite for AEB points
CHILD OCCUPANT
Comments
In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body areas was good except for the necks of both dummies, protection of which was rated as adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good for all critical parts of the body. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Jimny is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
VULNERABLE ROAD USERS
Comments
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded at the front of the bonnet and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The AEB system showed weak performance in tests of its pedestrian avoidance in daylight and does not operate in low light. The system cannot react to faster-moving road-users like cyclists.
SAFETY ASSIST
Comments
The Jimny has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats as standard. The AEB system performed adequately in tests of its
performance at highway speeds. There is a lane departure warning system as standard, but no lane keep assistance. The speed assistance system allows the driver to set the maximum speed of the vehicl
"2018 Suzuki Jimny Crash Test - 3 Star"
"SUBSCRIBE NOW"
Видео 2019 Suzuki Jimny - Crash Test канала AutoShow
Comments
In the frontal offset test, there was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent it from 'bottoming out', allowing the head to contact the steering wheel. The score for the head was penalised for the behaviour of the airbag and the displacement of the steering wheel, and protection for this part of the body was rated as marginal. The passenger compartment was extensively deformed in the offset test, especially around the door-frame and the score for the driver's chest was penalised for this unstable collapse. Combined with marginal dummy readings, protection for this body area was rated as weak. Although dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger, structures in the instrument panel and dashboard were thought to pose a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes, and protection was rated as marginal. In the full-width, rigid-barrier impact protection of the head of the rear passenger dummy was rated as weak, based on dummy readings during the test and protection of the chest of both driver and rear passenger was marginal. Tests on the front seats and head restraints showed marginal protection against whiplash injury in a rear impact. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused. However, the Jimny did not qualify for these points as Euro NCAP requires good head restraint performance as a pre-requisite for AEB points
CHILD OCCUPANT
Comments
In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body areas was good except for the necks of both dummies, protection of which was rated as adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good for all critical parts of the body. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Jimny is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
VULNERABLE ROAD USERS
Comments
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded at the front of the bonnet and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The AEB system showed weak performance in tests of its pedestrian avoidance in daylight and does not operate in low light. The system cannot react to faster-moving road-users like cyclists.
SAFETY ASSIST
Comments
The Jimny has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats as standard. The AEB system performed adequately in tests of its
performance at highway speeds. There is a lane departure warning system as standard, but no lane keep assistance. The speed assistance system allows the driver to set the maximum speed of the vehicl
"2018 Suzuki Jimny Crash Test - 3 Star"
"SUBSCRIBE NOW"
Видео 2019 Suzuki Jimny - Crash Test канала AutoShow
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Il Nuovo Suzuki Jimny portato ai suoi limiti - Parte 12019 Suzuki Jimny extreme test driveOFF ROAD: Suzuki Jimny VS Dacia Duster | Top GearLive in a 2020 Jimny(JB74)スズキ・ジムニーシエラ【オーナーズ◆アイ】オフロード走行編/SUZUKI JIMNY SIERRA / 2020Hummer H1 vs Suzuki Jimny - DRAG RACE *USA 🇺🇸 vs Japan 🇯🇵 *Jimny Camper. UK Woodland, Kuksa Carving, Campfire FoodROAMS01E33 Escaping A Kalahari Dust Storm While Offroad In My Jimny (2019)NEW SUZUKI JIMNY TAKES ON AUSTRALIA'S TOUGHEST TRACKS! Watagans 4wd trip 2020The LEAST SAFE new cars to CRASH in!2020 Suzuki Jimny 1.5 Allgrip 102 PS TOP SPEED AUTOBAHN DRIVE POV2019 Suzuki Jimny Review - AustraliaSuzuki Jimny 2019 - Maniobra de esquiva (moose test) y eslalon | km77.comAMG G63 v Suzuki Jimny v Jeep Wrangler - Up-Hill DRAG RACE & which is best OFF-ROAD!The Suzuki Jimny Is the Affordable Off-Roader America NeedsModificando Suzuki Jimny 2021 Parte - 2Exclusive: Suzuki Jimny 4x4 Review | Jimny | carandbike2019 Suzuki Jimny with G63 body kitCustom Suzuki Jimny is big on accessories | 4X4 AustraliaМинималист-Ухаалаг хэрэглэгчийн сонголт #Suzuki #Jimny