Is JUST and UNJUST CONTEXTUAL? Examining Changing Notions of Justice | UPSC Ethics Mains Analysis

Justice is not a static concept—it evolves with societal, legal, and cultural shifts. In this video, we examine the statement: "The concept of Just and Unjust is contextual. What was just a year back, may turn out to be unjust in today’s context." Through historical examples like Section 377, Sabarimala Temple case, and the right to privacy, we explore how justice adapts over time. Additionally, we analyze the role of civil servants in balancing procedural form with substantive justice. Join us as we break down these crucial themes for UPSC Ethics (GS-4).

📌 Topics Covered:
✔️ Evolution of Justice – Social, Legal, and Philosophical Shifts
✔️ Ethical Implications – John Rawls, Amartya Sen, and Institutional Reforms
✔️ Role of Civil Servants – Prioritizing Substance Over Form
✔️ Real-World Examples – Capital Punishment, Marital Rape Laws, Bureaucratic Injustice

🔥 Stay ahead in your UPSC preparation! Don’t forget to LIKE, SHARE, and SUBSCRIBE for more insightful content.

#upsc #ethics #justice #gs4 #upscmains #civilservicesexam #philosophy #governance #ethicaldilemma #ethicsintegrityaptitude #publicadministration #upsc2025 #indianpolity #lawandjustice #currentaffairs #sabarimala #righttoprivacy #ethicalgovernance #ethicaldecisionmaking #upscmains2025 #upscpreparation #philosophy #civilservicesexam #ethicsingovernance @PhilosophyEthicsSimplified #ethicssimplified

Видео Is JUST and UNJUST CONTEXTUAL? Examining Changing Notions of Justice | UPSC Ethics Mains Analysis канала Philosophy & Ethics Simplified for UPSC