Skepticism vs Dogmatism

From the book "THE GREAT DISCREPANCY" by Boris Kriger
https://boriskriger.com/contradictionofideas/

In the heart of intellectual discourse, skepticism and dogmatism stand as towering sentinels, embodying the far-reaching spectrum of human perspectives on knowledge, belief, and the nature of truth. This dynamic dichotomy challenges us to explore the intricate map of our cognition, questioning not only what we know but also the very capacity we can know anything at all.
Skepticism, an invaluable tool in the philosopher's arsenal, promotes an attitude of inquiry and doubt about the certitude of knowledge. It does not stand as a monolithic entity, but rather embodies an array of viewpoints, each adding another dimension to this philosophy. The skeptical lens comes into focus differently depending on its field of view. A universal skeptic would question the potential of gaining any genuine knowledge, suggesting a landscape where everything we consider to be 'known' is shrouded in mist. On the other hand, a localized skeptic might isolate their skepticism to specific domains, such as the abstract notions of morality or the profound enigma of metaphysics.
Delving into the skeptic's mindset uncovers a world characterized by perpetual questioning, a world where knowledge is fluid and constantly being scrutinized. Such a worldview encourages us to cast a critical eye on our certainties and assumptions, to maintain an open mind, and to value the journey of seeking truth as much as - if not more than - the end destination. This acceptance of the unknown and the unknowable, while it might seem daunting, provides the flexibility to adapt, to learn, and to grow. The canvas of skepticism, with its myriad shades and tones, paints a portrait of knowledge as an unending voyage of discovery rather than a fixed destination.

https://boriskriger.com/
Моб./WhatsApp +1 (705) 571-4325
https://www.facebook.com/boris.kriger
email: boriskriger@gmail.com

Видео Skepticism vs Dogmatism канала ALTASPERA