Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad
Learn the rule and the rest of the story in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad, a torts case read by law students around the world.
Newsletter Sign-Up: http://eepurl.com/cBOaBv
Facebook: https://facebook.com/LearnLawBetter
Website: https://LearnLawBetter.com
Today I am going to help you understand Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad.
Cardozo’s majority opinion determined that the railroad owed no duty of care to Helen Palsgraf because she was not within the range of apprehension. In other words, she was not a foreseeable plaintiff and foreseeable plaintiffs are determined under the duty element, not the proximate cause element.
Видео Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad канала Learn Law Better
Newsletter Sign-Up: http://eepurl.com/cBOaBv
Facebook: https://facebook.com/LearnLawBetter
Website: https://LearnLawBetter.com
Today I am going to help you understand Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad.
Cardozo’s majority opinion determined that the railroad owed no duty of care to Helen Palsgraf because she was not within the range of apprehension. In other words, she was not a foreseeable plaintiff and foreseeable plaintiffs are determined under the duty element, not the proximate cause element.
Видео Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad канала Learn Law Better
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
How to Analyze Negligence on a Torts Essay (Pt. 1): Palsgraf & The Duty of CareProximate CauseMoore v Regents of University of California | ConversionLaw School Grading Curve & PainErie v TompkinsUS v. Carroll TowingIssue SpottingPalsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedIntervening CausePalsgraf v Long Island RailroadPalsgraf v. Long Island Railroad EdimationRes Ipsa LoquiturInternational Shoe Co. v. WashingtonRespondeat SuperiorPalsgraf vs long island railroadGarratt v Dailey FINALDefamation(R) Miller V SoS for Exiting EU 2017Preparing for Law SchoolNew York Times Co. v. Sullivan Summary | quimbee.com