Bedroom Politics: Equality of Outcome?

Show your support for the channel, chat with me and join our private community: https://www.patreon.com/alexandergrace

--------------------------------------------------------------

Read my Review of 'Land of the Losers' - https://www.patreon.com/posts/land-of-losers-22113200

----------------------------------------------------------------

If you live in Australia and would like 10% off the price of a hard cover version of 'Land of the Losers' click here:

http://www.the-niceguy.com/book/hardcover-australia-redpill.html

---------------------------------------------------------------

If you want to order and online copy of the book with a special 20% discount for followers of this channel use the code below when you click on this link.

Code = RN48G

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/778570

---------------------------------------------------------------

If you don't care about getting a discount and would rather buy through Amazon, click on this link:

https://www.amazon.com.au/gp/product/B079Q8C1JK/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=alexandergrac-22&linkId=a709a4d352a878a61c12148c352c842b&language=en_AU

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disturbing Belief I See Tossed Around On Here Routinely Regarding “Fairness” In S&*

I just read a recent thread about a man who was interested in having an MFF thr$%some with his girlfriend, but was hesitant about having a MMF in return, and he was feeling guilty about that, and some people even chimed in that it’s not “fair” if him and his partner had an MFF but not a MMF. 

I’ve also seen threads where a man is guilted for wanting to try anal with his gf, but not being comfortable with having her peg him. Again, some people will guilt the OP by saying it’s not “fair” that he has a^#l s%^ with her but won’t agree to getting pegged.

Now let me say clearly - no one, man or woman, should ever be forced into an uncomfortable situation. We all have boundaries and those boundaries should be respected. 

But if someone agrees to a s#$ act because they feel comfortable with it, their partner should not be guilted into a role reversal of the same s*% act because it’s “fair.” 

So in my first example with the threesome - if OP’s girlfriend is comfortable with having a MFF, and is willing to have one...OP shouldn’t then be guilted into having a MMF. It’s not his fault his girlfriend was interested in adding an extra woman to the bedroom. If he’s uncomfortable adding a man into the mix, he shouldn’t be expected to even the score, so to speak. Because in that equation, his girlfriend got to have two s%&#%l experiences she was comfortable with, whereas he had one experience he was comfortable with and one he was uncomfortable with. 

Same with the a@$l example. If a woman is open to trying a&^l, then those two partners can explore a%^l. That doesn’t mean the guy then has to agree to get his a$$ pegged if he knows without a doubt that’s not something he’d be interested in.

It bothers me that there’s adults that believe this. That s!# is some quid pro quo transaction where anything you’re willing to do means you then have to be willing to have done to you or else you’re being unfair/hypocritical. 

And again I want to make the distinction that - I’m talking specifically about partners being comfortable with certain s%^ acts. Obviously if a person is pushing their significant other to do something they’re uncomfortable with, then it’s hypocritical to not offer the same open mindedness in return.

But if I’m meeting a girl who’s openly down to try a MFF? I’m not going to give her a MMF in return because I have no interest in that.

I mean, am I wrong here? Do people out there actually believe that s#@ needs to be “even?”

Видео Bedroom Politics: Equality of Outcome? канала Alexander Grace