Debate: European Missile Defenses for NATO
The Project on Nuclear Issues (PONI) and Ploughshares Fund are pleased to invite you to the first in a debate series on a range of nuclear challenges and policy decisions the Trump administration will face in 2017. The debate series aims to provide a forum for in-depth exploration of arguments on both sides of key nuclear policy issues. Additional topics and dates will be confirmed soon.
Debate question:
Participants will be asked to address the following statement:
Resolved – The U.S. should continue to expand European missile defenses for NATO
The current approach to European missile defenses emerged prior to the conclusion of the agreement to limit Iran’s nuclear program (JCPOA) at a time when missile threats from beyond the European theater dominated the European Security landscape. Since that time, much has changed, including the Russian annexation of Crimea and finalization of the JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran. This shifting security landscape has returned the spotlight to European missile defenses – but views on the way forward diverge sharply. While some call for expanded missile defenses to bolster assurances to NATO partners, others call for pausing the program before a new site is built in Poland as a means to deescalate tensions with Russia. Thomas Karako and Frank Rose will present arguments in favor of expanding U.S. missiles defenses for NATO, and Joseph Cirincione and Philip Coyle will argue against.
This event is supported by funding from Ploughshares Fund, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Видео Debate: European Missile Defenses for NATO канала Center for Strategic & International Studies
Debate question:
Participants will be asked to address the following statement:
Resolved – The U.S. should continue to expand European missile defenses for NATO
The current approach to European missile defenses emerged prior to the conclusion of the agreement to limit Iran’s nuclear program (JCPOA) at a time when missile threats from beyond the European theater dominated the European Security landscape. Since that time, much has changed, including the Russian annexation of Crimea and finalization of the JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran. This shifting security landscape has returned the spotlight to European missile defenses – but views on the way forward diverge sharply. While some call for expanded missile defenses to bolster assurances to NATO partners, others call for pausing the program before a new site is built in Poland as a means to deescalate tensions with Russia. Thomas Karako and Frank Rose will present arguments in favor of expanding U.S. missiles defenses for NATO, and Joseph Cirincione and Philip Coyle will argue against.
This event is supported by funding from Ploughshares Fund, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Видео Debate: European Missile Defenses for NATO канала Center for Strategic & International Studies
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
17 февраля 2017 г. 4:03:09
01:26:23
Другие видео канала
![Strengthening the Guyana – U.S. Relationship](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NPtuw2qS3_s/default.jpg)
![Aegis Ashore and the Future of European Missile Defense](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iCvIULK6FHI/default.jpg)
![Second 2020 Presidential Debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bPiofmZGb8o/default.jpg)
![The Nuclear Posture in Review: AM Session](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mP_lzjFiKK8/default.jpg)
![Unpacking the Zones for Employment and Economic Development in Honduras](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1f7TvKI0e2M/default.jpg)
![NATO troop movements in Europe: Will it matter for Ukraine? | DW News](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Kze0o1ME4bc/default.jpg)
![Crisis Crossroads Ukraine: A New Phase of War](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/x5_3naJoypc/default.jpg)
![Kenya Elections 2022: What's Next?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-dlE1zEjXUU/default.jpg)
![How to Build a Hydrogen Hub: Houston](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/peqYwgjh0iQ/default.jpg)
![Towards a 4th Taiwan Strait Crisis?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RzDh_TnVwQ0/default.jpg)
![Japan’s Vision for a Free, Open and Inclusive International Order Based on the Rule of Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Tos6LlnJ-Y0/default.jpg)
![The Nuclear Posture in Review: PM Session](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AIVylIF06A0/default.jpg)
![Why "Big Data China" Is Needed More Than Ever](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WPgLd72RR4I/default.jpg)
![Beyond the Emergency: Donor Perspectives on Ukraine's Economic Reconstruction](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7KCJqAiexrI/default.jpg)
![Afghanistan One Year Later: Consequences & Responsibilities](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUafYPhmiFE/default.jpg)
![Democratic Responses to Foreign Interference: Learning from Australia's Experience](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MnENXPvNO6o/default.jpg)
![Sand Dam Technology Transforms Lives in African Drylands](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kSGMo_rI5A0/default.jpg)
![A Warning of War](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eRwZBuwG7G0/default.jpg)
![Post Practice (8/19/22) Interview with Defensive Lineman Chris Frey](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qtdv0MSCSOI/default.jpg)
![National Security Adviser: Inaugural speech](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fsmQg07Hs7Y/default.jpg)