Street Epistemology: Apollos (3) | Tenacious Apologist Returns (Boundaries)
Street Epistemology Boundaries Consent Summary: My tenacious interlocutor returns to discuss his lively Street Epistemology Discord server engagements that occurred in the interim. I do some more "messaging" than normal in this one, likely in response to them asking me questions.
te·na·cious
/təˈnāSHəs/
adjective
1. tending to keep a firm hold of something; clinging or adhering closely.
2. not readily relinquishing a position, principle, or course of action; determined.
3. persisting in existence; not easily dispelled.
Note: I found in interesting how "importance" of the claim was being viewed differently by both parties here. The students seem to be using it as "needed" while I seem to be viewing it as "fantastic." If only I had asked something like, "Are you saying that, the more necessary a claim is to a person, the more likely the attestations of others from a long time ago are true?", or something to that effect. IL2 at one point asks, "What happens to me?," as if that should be a factor in assessing the truth of a claim. I was later reminded about a discussion I had about differences in adjective meanings, like we might see with a word like "important" or "extraordinary". In their view, it seems, if a claim is "important" to them personally (like "Jesus rose from the dead," it's less likely someone would lie or be mistaken about the claim, and therefore you can accept what they stated as true to a high degree of confidence. Whereas from my perspective (and perhaps others who might be more skeptically-minded) we see "importance" as a biasing factor to control for; the more important or impactful one might find a claim to them personally is a reason to apply more—not less—scrutiny to the supporting reasons. Check out Pinecreek on YouTube and his more advanced "Flying Man" ( https://youtu.be/2ZNiCpeF_Jg?t=4789 ) example, which is further along than I was here with my off-the-cuff car metaphor in 2019. I'd like to see this idea of how we might be using adjectives differently explored further in future SE discussions.
This artistic overlay was applied in lieu of blurring individual faces, as per private agreement.
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Recorded: 25 November 2019
Released: 27 May 2021
bound·a·ry
/ˈbound(ə)rē/
noun
plural noun: boundaries
1. a line that marks the limits of an area; a dividing line.
2. a limit of a subject or sphere of activity.
Anthony's Social Media: https://linktr.ee/magnabosco
Street Epistemology Resources: https://tinyurl.com/abm-se-resources
Street Epistemology Communities: https://tinyurl.com/abm-se-community
Street Epistemology Discord Server: https://discord.gg/sKap3zM (recommended)
Street Epistemology Survey: https://se-survey.web.app/en
Skip ahead to a desired point in the talk:
--
Intro: 00:01
Carolina: 00:16
Best Entrance Ever: 00:44
Interruption: 01:05
Start: 03:07
Opting Out: 03:32
Staying Cool?: 07:44
Faith: 08:07
Testing: 12:49
Peace Out: 14:28
Elon's Tesla: 18:14
What Happens to Me?: 20:36
Handshakes: 24:40
Have a Blessed Day: 24:55, 26:30
Equipment Change: 25:09
Closing Thoughts: 25:47
Consent: 26:58
Get Right Back in There: 27:39
End Screen: 27:42
Bonus Footage: 28:05
--
Note: Add 35 seconds to these timestamps if listening to the podcast version of this talk.
Audio Only: https://soundcloud.com/user-534471447/ep-440-dialogue-anthony-magnabosco-apollos-3-boundaries-skin-in-the-game
Audio correction provided by Philipp Grzemba.
Intro Music '19th Floor' by Bobby Richards, provided by YouTube.
Audio Clip: 'Say Good Night' by Joakim Karud, Unported— CC BY-SA 3.0
Links to References in Video:
IL1's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuhe7b8v1lgHQCppxEEI_uw
Watch 1st talk w/IL1: https://youtu.be/DBBW-ZUjKEM
Watch 2nd talk w/IL1: https://youtu.be/w3bu-yc8sRI
Watch 3rd talk w/IL1: https://youtu.be/HQWeRF0OBG4 (this video)
Watch more faith talk: https://youtu.be/hxDD3sajaxw (How Faith Ends)
Watch talk w/Jenna (ACA Host): https://youtu.be/S_0JhCv1mTs
** Create foreign language captions and I'll add to this video **
Mistakes: Please let me know if you spot any.
Recorded w/Go-Pro. Edited w/PowerDirector (AI Style Plugin, Impressionist Painting 1, Keep original color).
The views addressed here are mine and mine alone, and are not necessarily shared by members of my family and friends.
#StreetEpistemology #Boundaries #Magnabosco #Consent #ChristianApologetics #Tesla #AnthonyMagnabosco
Видео Street Epistemology: Apollos (3) | Tenacious Apologist Returns (Boundaries) канала Anthony Magnabosco
te·na·cious
/təˈnāSHəs/
adjective
1. tending to keep a firm hold of something; clinging or adhering closely.
2. not readily relinquishing a position, principle, or course of action; determined.
3. persisting in existence; not easily dispelled.
Note: I found in interesting how "importance" of the claim was being viewed differently by both parties here. The students seem to be using it as "needed" while I seem to be viewing it as "fantastic." If only I had asked something like, "Are you saying that, the more necessary a claim is to a person, the more likely the attestations of others from a long time ago are true?", or something to that effect. IL2 at one point asks, "What happens to me?," as if that should be a factor in assessing the truth of a claim. I was later reminded about a discussion I had about differences in adjective meanings, like we might see with a word like "important" or "extraordinary". In their view, it seems, if a claim is "important" to them personally (like "Jesus rose from the dead," it's less likely someone would lie or be mistaken about the claim, and therefore you can accept what they stated as true to a high degree of confidence. Whereas from my perspective (and perhaps others who might be more skeptically-minded) we see "importance" as a biasing factor to control for; the more important or impactful one might find a claim to them personally is a reason to apply more—not less—scrutiny to the supporting reasons. Check out Pinecreek on YouTube and his more advanced "Flying Man" ( https://youtu.be/2ZNiCpeF_Jg?t=4789 ) example, which is further along than I was here with my off-the-cuff car metaphor in 2019. I'd like to see this idea of how we might be using adjectives differently explored further in future SE discussions.
This artistic overlay was applied in lieu of blurring individual faces, as per private agreement.
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Recorded: 25 November 2019
Released: 27 May 2021
bound·a·ry
/ˈbound(ə)rē/
noun
plural noun: boundaries
1. a line that marks the limits of an area; a dividing line.
2. a limit of a subject or sphere of activity.
Anthony's Social Media: https://linktr.ee/magnabosco
Street Epistemology Resources: https://tinyurl.com/abm-se-resources
Street Epistemology Communities: https://tinyurl.com/abm-se-community
Street Epistemology Discord Server: https://discord.gg/sKap3zM (recommended)
Street Epistemology Survey: https://se-survey.web.app/en
Skip ahead to a desired point in the talk:
--
Intro: 00:01
Carolina: 00:16
Best Entrance Ever: 00:44
Interruption: 01:05
Start: 03:07
Opting Out: 03:32
Staying Cool?: 07:44
Faith: 08:07
Testing: 12:49
Peace Out: 14:28
Elon's Tesla: 18:14
What Happens to Me?: 20:36
Handshakes: 24:40
Have a Blessed Day: 24:55, 26:30
Equipment Change: 25:09
Closing Thoughts: 25:47
Consent: 26:58
Get Right Back in There: 27:39
End Screen: 27:42
Bonus Footage: 28:05
--
Note: Add 35 seconds to these timestamps if listening to the podcast version of this talk.
Audio Only: https://soundcloud.com/user-534471447/ep-440-dialogue-anthony-magnabosco-apollos-3-boundaries-skin-in-the-game
Audio correction provided by Philipp Grzemba.
Intro Music '19th Floor' by Bobby Richards, provided by YouTube.
Audio Clip: 'Say Good Night' by Joakim Karud, Unported— CC BY-SA 3.0
Links to References in Video:
IL1's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuhe7b8v1lgHQCppxEEI_uw
Watch 1st talk w/IL1: https://youtu.be/DBBW-ZUjKEM
Watch 2nd talk w/IL1: https://youtu.be/w3bu-yc8sRI
Watch 3rd talk w/IL1: https://youtu.be/HQWeRF0OBG4 (this video)
Watch more faith talk: https://youtu.be/hxDD3sajaxw (How Faith Ends)
Watch talk w/Jenna (ACA Host): https://youtu.be/S_0JhCv1mTs
** Create foreign language captions and I'll add to this video **
Mistakes: Please let me know if you spot any.
Recorded w/Go-Pro. Edited w/PowerDirector (AI Style Plugin, Impressionist Painting 1, Keep original color).
The views addressed here are mine and mine alone, and are not necessarily shared by members of my family and friends.
#StreetEpistemology #Boundaries #Magnabosco #Consent #ChristianApologetics #Tesla #AnthonyMagnabosco
Видео Street Epistemology: Apollos (3) | Tenacious Apologist Returns (Boundaries) канала Anthony Magnabosco
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
![Street Epistemology: Kyle (3) | Obey My God or Stay Away](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Tkpz5btDdgM/default.jpg)
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WNg_eihJCYg/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Apollos (1) | Jesus Rose from the Dead (Corroboration)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DBBW-ZUjKEM/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: LDS Missionaries Meet Atheist (Book of Mormon)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zv0l2LVww2I/default.jpg)
![I Didn't Even Learn This in Bible Class – Tia | Street Epistemology](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/A-M1EyhcRS8/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology Breakdown: How Do I Test My God Belief?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MEcSB04qXlY/default.jpg)
![What is (and Why Do) Street Epistemology | Dutch Skeptics | 1 of 3](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9gHmhObfbn4/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Tina | Evil Eye Ojo (Busted by the Cops)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/An7IHlm5wco/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Shane (3) | Minister Scouts the Base (Morality)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4e1f_k-kPDU/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Shane (4) | Linchpin to My God Belief (Prioritization)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9ahfNpYbaTk/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Maritza (2) | Student Demands Evidence (Consistency)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v9utXKpFxCo/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Sydnee | Transgenderism (Gender is a Social Construct)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BThJndS_xIQ/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Mormon Elders Fuel Atheist (Testability)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Alm4bD5xnCg/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Justin | Atheists Need God to be Good (Guidance)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fxC0S4go3j8/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Carlos | A Crisis of Faith](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/U4ixyjdc0os/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Creationist Claims Manipulation (2) (Unexpected Feedback | Protection)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/j2EZaQx6VcA/default.jpg)
![An Atheist Takes "The God Test"](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uYFzepUZJiE/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Rome & Sergio | An Awkward Silence](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iNig9uykV7E/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Sebastian and Josh | How to Talk with Conspiracy Theorists (Conspiracies)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oGZLJkSsW_w/default.jpg)
![Street Epistemology: Daniel & Beau | What Else Do We Have But Faith?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OpwxM2wNChE/default.jpg)