Загрузка...

Cinebloom 20% On 16mm vs 35mm vs 105mm — BIG Differences

I tested the Cinebloom 20% diffusion filter on three lenses — the **Sigma 16mm f2.8, the Sigma 35mm f1.4, and the Sony 28–105mm f4 — to see how each focal length and aperture reacts to the same diffusion strength.

At **16mm f2.8**, the bloom is the *strongest* and the entire scene glows.

At **35mm f1.4**, Cinebloom hits the *cinematic sweet spot* with perfect halation.

At **105mm f4**, diffusion becomes *subtle and clean* while still smoothing skin and highlights.

In this video I cover:

• Cinebloom 20% on **16mm f2.8 vs 35mm f1.4 vs 105mm f4**

• Skin softening, halation, highlight bloom

• Portrait, product, and indoor B-roll tests

• A/B comparisons with and without Cinebloom

• Whether 20% is too strong on wide lenses

• Which focal length handles diffusion BEST

• Whether you should get Cinebloom 20% or 10%

If you’re thinking about buying a Cinebloom filter, watch this first.

🎨 LUTS (🏷️50% Viewer Discount)
https://chronixel.gumroad.com/l/CinematicLut/6MINUTE

⌚️Timestamps:
0:00 Cinebloom 20% Quick Look
0:28 What To Expect
1:03 What Are Diffusion Filters
1:23 Cinebloom on 16mm f2.8
2:15 Cinebloom on 35mm f1.4
2:54 Cinebloom on 105mm f4
3:43 Side-By-Side Comparison
4:23 Pro's & Cons
5:33 Should you buy Moment's Cinebloom 20%

#cinebloom #cinebloom20 #diffusionfilter #cameraaccessories #filmiclook #cinematiclighting #broll #sonya7iii #sigma35mm #sigma16mm #photographygear #videographtips #contentcreatortips #

🎥 Shot on Sony A7III • Sigma 16mm f2.8 • Sigma 35mm f1.4 • Sony 28–105mm • S-Cinetone & Cine 4 • Editted On DaVinci Resolve

Видео Cinebloom 20% On 16mm vs 35mm vs 105mm — BIG Differences канала Chronixel
Яндекс.Метрика
Все заметки Новая заметка Страницу в заметки
Страницу в закладки Мои закладки
На информационно-развлекательном портале SALDA.WS применяются cookie-файлы. Нажимая кнопку Принять, вы подтверждаете свое согласие на их использование.
О CookiesНапомнить позжеПринять