20 Most Common Logical Fallacies
What is an argument? What is a bad argument? Train your argumentation skills by studying "bad" logic. In this video, we discuss 20 common argumentation mistakes or logical fallacies.
00:00 Introduction: Spot the Fallacy
02:10 What Is an Argument?
05:10 Twenty Most Common Fallacies
06:50 1 — Ad Hominem
09:59 2 — Appeal to Common Belief
12:20 3 — Appeal to Emotion
14:15 4 — Appeal to Law
16:30 5 — Argument from Offence
17:42 6 — Argument from Trauma
21:31 7 — Begging the Question
23:12 8 — Bulverism
25:00 9 — Cherry Picking
28:59 10 — Chronological Snobbery
30:32 11 — False Dilemma
32:35 12 — Genetic Fallacy
33:40 13 — No True Scotsman
35:19 14 — Non Sequitur
37:15 15 — Poisoning the Well
38:52 16 — Reductio ad Hitlerum
41:42 17 — Slippery Slope
43:41 18 — Strawman Fallacy
45:15 19 — Unfalsifiability
47:18 20 — Whataboutism
50:32 Recapitulation (and a Secret)
Spot the Fallacy is a game, a pedagogical tool I developed to help undergraduates who have little (sometimes no) grounding in logic and argumentation.
At the beginning of each course, I introduce and demonstrate 20 “most common” logical fallacies (such as ad hominem, slippery slope, chronological snobbery, etc). I then tell students that I will be *deliberately* committing one fallacy per lecture. And I challenge them to “catch me”.
Eyes light up. Learning becomes a game. The most rewarding part are the fun discussions we have at the end of each lecture about what students found problematic in my argumentation and whether it amounted to a fallacy or not.
Obviously, the purpose is to help hone transferable critical skills, train intellectual and moral virtues, and foster a posture of learning that avoids the opposite pitfalls of naïve credulity and categorical cynicism. Ironically but predictably, learning about “bad” logic has translated into good essays and even better conversations.
I try to mix it up each year by introducing new fallacies. This keeps fresh even for returning students. This year's two new fallacies are Argument from Trauma and Whataboutism.
Oxford-style Online Tutorials with Dr. Jason Lepojärvi:
https://studycslewis.com/references-main2/
Видео 20 Most Common Logical Fallacies канала Dr. Jason Lepojärvi
00:00 Introduction: Spot the Fallacy
02:10 What Is an Argument?
05:10 Twenty Most Common Fallacies
06:50 1 — Ad Hominem
09:59 2 — Appeal to Common Belief
12:20 3 — Appeal to Emotion
14:15 4 — Appeal to Law
16:30 5 — Argument from Offence
17:42 6 — Argument from Trauma
21:31 7 — Begging the Question
23:12 8 — Bulverism
25:00 9 — Cherry Picking
28:59 10 — Chronological Snobbery
30:32 11 — False Dilemma
32:35 12 — Genetic Fallacy
33:40 13 — No True Scotsman
35:19 14 — Non Sequitur
37:15 15 — Poisoning the Well
38:52 16 — Reductio ad Hitlerum
41:42 17 — Slippery Slope
43:41 18 — Strawman Fallacy
45:15 19 — Unfalsifiability
47:18 20 — Whataboutism
50:32 Recapitulation (and a Secret)
Spot the Fallacy is a game, a pedagogical tool I developed to help undergraduates who have little (sometimes no) grounding in logic and argumentation.
At the beginning of each course, I introduce and demonstrate 20 “most common” logical fallacies (such as ad hominem, slippery slope, chronological snobbery, etc). I then tell students that I will be *deliberately* committing one fallacy per lecture. And I challenge them to “catch me”.
Eyes light up. Learning becomes a game. The most rewarding part are the fun discussions we have at the end of each lecture about what students found problematic in my argumentation and whether it amounted to a fallacy or not.
Obviously, the purpose is to help hone transferable critical skills, train intellectual and moral virtues, and foster a posture of learning that avoids the opposite pitfalls of naïve credulity and categorical cynicism. Ironically but predictably, learning about “bad” logic has translated into good essays and even better conversations.
I try to mix it up each year by introducing new fallacies. This keeps fresh even for returning students. This year's two new fallacies are Argument from Trauma and Whataboutism.
Oxford-style Online Tutorials with Dr. Jason Lepojärvi:
https://studycslewis.com/references-main2/
Видео 20 Most Common Logical Fallacies канала Dr. Jason Lepojärvi
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Oxford-style Tutorial Essay Writing TipsC.S. Lewis on Love (Part 4): Erotic Disagreements – Lewis vs. NygrenIsät meidän? Isänrakkauden teologiaaThe Chronicles of Narnia (Part 6): The Magician's Nephew and VenusHow To Love Enemies?The Chronicles of Narnia (Part 2): Prince Caspian and MarsOxford-style Tutorial Discussion TipsC.S. Lewis on Love (Part 8): The Problem of EvilC.S. Lewis on Love (Part 7): Idolatry and MaryC.S. Lewis on Love (Part 6): Lewis versus St. Augustine on LoveThe Chronicles of Narnia (Part 4): The Silver Chair and LunaThe Chronicles of Narnia (Part 7): The Last Battle and SaturnPrinsessan johtajasäännöt™C.S. Lewis on Friendship: Sexism, Secrecy, and Snobbery?C.S. Lewis on Love (Part 1): What Exactly Is Love?The Chronicles of Narnia (Part 3): The Voyage of the "Dawn Treader" and SolSurprised by Joy at "Little Lea", C.S. Lewis's Childhood Home in BelfastC.S. Lewis on Love (Part 2): Patriotism or the Love of CountryC.S. Lewis on Enemy Love | Jason Lepojärvi at the Oxford University C.S. Lewis SocietyThe Chronicles of Narnia (Part 8): Why Did Lewis Write Them?