- Популярные видео
- Авто
- Видео-блоги
- ДТП, аварии
- Для маленьких
- Еда, напитки
- Животные
- Закон и право
- Знаменитости
- Игры
- Искусство
- Комедии
- Красота, мода
- Кулинария, рецепты
- Люди
- Мото
- Музыка
- Мультфильмы
- Наука, технологии
- Новости
- Образование
- Политика
- Праздники
- Приколы
- Природа
- Происшествия
- Путешествия
- Развлечения
- Ржач
- Семья
- Сериалы
- Спорт
- Стиль жизни
- ТВ передачи
- Танцы
- Технологии
- Товары
- Ужасы
- Фильмы
- Шоу-бизнес
- Юмор
Artemis II is going around the moon on Wednesday, here's why it's controversial ($93 Billion)
Wednesday at 6:24 PM EDT, four astronauts will launch toward the moon for the first time since 1972. But is the $93 billion program worth it?
THE MISSION
Artemis II launches Wednesday, April 1, 6:24 PM EST from Kennedy Space Center, Florida.
Crew:
• Commander Reid Wiseman (NASA)
• Pilot Victor Glover (NASA) - First person of color beyond low Earth orbit
• Christina Koch (NASA) - First woman beyond low Earth orbit
• Jeremy Hansen (Canadian Space Agency) - First non-American to moon
Mission: 10-day lunar flyby, no landing. Testing systems for Artemis III landing in 2028.
WHY IT MATTERS
This isn't Apollo. This time, we're STAYING.
NASA's plan:
• Permanent lunar base at south pole
• Mine water ice → convert to rocket fuel
• Use moon as "gas station" for Mars missions
• Test long-term survival systems
• Practice living off-world before Mars
Also: China aims to land on moon by 2030. This is the new space race.
THE CONTROVERSY
Cost to date: $93 BILLION (2012-2025)
Cost per launch: $4.1 BILLION
Original plan: $5B total for rocket, launch 2016
Reality: $20B, launching 2026 (10 years late)
NASA Inspector General: "The price tag strikes us as unsustainable."
What $93 billion could fund instead:
• James Webb Telescope × 9
• End world hunger for 2 years
• Free community college for 6M students
• 9,300 new schools
SpaceX alternative:
• Starship development: $5B
• Cost per launch: $90M (vs NASA's $4,100M)
• But Starship still not operational and has its own headaches
PRO (Pamela Melroy, former Deputy Administrator):
• Establishes international norms for space
• Creates new lunar economy
• Essential prep for Mars missions
• If we don't, China will (and won't share)
CON (Critics):
• Skip moon, go straight to Mars
• Fix Earth's problems first
• Unsustainable costs
• Commercial space does it cheaper
THE REAL QUESTION
Is becoming a multi-planetary species worth $93 billion when we have climate change, infrastructure collapse, housing crisis, and underfunded schools?
There's no easy answer. Tomorrow's launch forces us to choose:
Invest in space exploration or solve Earth's problems first?
Watch live: 6:24 PM EST, April 1, 2026
PhD astronomer | NASA JPL Planck | Breaking down space policy
What do YOU think? Worth it or waste? ⬇️
#Artemis #ArtemisII #NASA #Moon #SpaceLaunch #Controversy #Budget #China #SpaceRace #Mars
Видео Artemis II is going around the moon on Wednesday, here's why it's controversial ($93 Billion) канала Nerduino
THE MISSION
Artemis II launches Wednesday, April 1, 6:24 PM EST from Kennedy Space Center, Florida.
Crew:
• Commander Reid Wiseman (NASA)
• Pilot Victor Glover (NASA) - First person of color beyond low Earth orbit
• Christina Koch (NASA) - First woman beyond low Earth orbit
• Jeremy Hansen (Canadian Space Agency) - First non-American to moon
Mission: 10-day lunar flyby, no landing. Testing systems for Artemis III landing in 2028.
WHY IT MATTERS
This isn't Apollo. This time, we're STAYING.
NASA's plan:
• Permanent lunar base at south pole
• Mine water ice → convert to rocket fuel
• Use moon as "gas station" for Mars missions
• Test long-term survival systems
• Practice living off-world before Mars
Also: China aims to land on moon by 2030. This is the new space race.
THE CONTROVERSY
Cost to date: $93 BILLION (2012-2025)
Cost per launch: $4.1 BILLION
Original plan: $5B total for rocket, launch 2016
Reality: $20B, launching 2026 (10 years late)
NASA Inspector General: "The price tag strikes us as unsustainable."
What $93 billion could fund instead:
• James Webb Telescope × 9
• End world hunger for 2 years
• Free community college for 6M students
• 9,300 new schools
SpaceX alternative:
• Starship development: $5B
• Cost per launch: $90M (vs NASA's $4,100M)
• But Starship still not operational and has its own headaches
PRO (Pamela Melroy, former Deputy Administrator):
• Establishes international norms for space
• Creates new lunar economy
• Essential prep for Mars missions
• If we don't, China will (and won't share)
CON (Critics):
• Skip moon, go straight to Mars
• Fix Earth's problems first
• Unsustainable costs
• Commercial space does it cheaper
THE REAL QUESTION
Is becoming a multi-planetary species worth $93 billion when we have climate change, infrastructure collapse, housing crisis, and underfunded schools?
There's no easy answer. Tomorrow's launch forces us to choose:
Invest in space exploration or solve Earth's problems first?
Watch live: 6:24 PM EST, April 1, 2026
PhD astronomer | NASA JPL Planck | Breaking down space policy
What do YOU think? Worth it or waste? ⬇️
#Artemis #ArtemisII #NASA #Moon #SpaceLaunch #Controversy #Budget #China #SpaceRace #Mars
Видео Artemis II is going around the moon on Wednesday, here's why it's controversial ($93 Billion) канала Nerduino
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
31 марта 2026 г. 4:15:09
00:02:41
Другие видео канала





















