Rebutting Harrub: Argument from Historical Scientists
This is the second in my series on Dr. Brad Harrub's "Origins" talk in College Station, TX around August 9th, 2012. In the section, I address his argument from historical scientists. The key point: Many scientists throughout history have been religious, but it was not their religious beliefs that informed their science. The fact that Dr. Harrub focuses on scientists who lived prior to Darwin says a lot.
I thought it might be interesting to explore the actual religious beliefs of the people being summoned to testify on Dr. Harrub's behalf. Most of them were unorthodox by today's standards, and some of them can better testify to the negative; that religious or superstitious belief has hindered science and the progress of knowledge.
The context of the clip from Dr. Harrub's talk is that he was addressing Bill Nye's comments that creationism can hold students back from understanding the actual science. This is true. When a person has a commitment to dogmatic doctrine that conflicts with truth or evidence, they face a difficult choice: either reject the truth, or reject the doctrine.
c0nc0rdance's wager:
Whenever a supernatural explanation competes with a natural explanation, so far in the history of science, the natural has always held up to more scrutiny.
Видео Rebutting Harrub: Argument from Historical Scientists канала C0nc0rdance
I thought it might be interesting to explore the actual religious beliefs of the people being summoned to testify on Dr. Harrub's behalf. Most of them were unorthodox by today's standards, and some of them can better testify to the negative; that religious or superstitious belief has hindered science and the progress of knowledge.
The context of the clip from Dr. Harrub's talk is that he was addressing Bill Nye's comments that creationism can hold students back from understanding the actual science. This is true. When a person has a commitment to dogmatic doctrine that conflicts with truth or evidence, they face a difficult choice: either reject the truth, or reject the doctrine.
c0nc0rdance's wager:
Whenever a supernatural explanation competes with a natural explanation, so far in the history of science, the natural has always held up to more scrutiny.
Видео Rebutting Harrub: Argument from Historical Scientists канала C0nc0rdance
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Rebutting Harrub: Finches never produce rhinos or fernsIsaac Asimov's "Science and Beauty"(3/3) The light of evolution: What would be lostCharles Darwin's "The Origin of Species"Journal Club: HFCS vs. sucroseEvolution and HIV for OFNF, Part 1Bertrand Russell's "China Teapot""Can We Know the Universe" by Carl SaganA Response to Jonathan M on Bacterial ChemotaxisEvolution and HIV for OFNF, Part 2Science vs Lore (2/2)An Open Letter to Casey LuskinThe Return of the C0nc0rdance!Christopher Hitchens' Address to the American Atheist Convention 2011Raising Kids Who Can ThinkCarl Sagan's "The Marriage of Skepticism and Wonder"Why I WON'T be celebrating Darwin Day 2011(2/3) The light of evolution: What would be lostThe Joy of Phylogeny: How To Make Your Own PhylogramWhat's the Harm: Homeopathy