AK-630M vs Goalkeeper (Cost Per Shot Comparison | CIWS)

💰 Thousands of rounds per minute — but how much does each second of defense really cost?

In this video we compare the Cost Per Shot between two iconic Close-In Weapon Systems (CIWS): Russia’s AK-630M and the Dutch-designed Goalkeeper CIWS.

The AK-630M uses a 30mm six-barrel rotary cannon capable of firing up to 5,000 rounds per minute, creating a dense wall of projectiles to destroy incoming missiles at close range. It focuses on volume of fire and rapid response, making it a staple of many naval platforms.

Meanwhile, the Goalkeeper CIWS takes a heavier approach with a 30mm GAU-8/A-based seven-barrel cannon. Known for its accuracy, powerful rounds, and advanced tracking radar, it delivers fewer but more precise and destructive shots, often requiring fewer rounds to neutralize a threat.

⚖️ Volume of fire vs precision lethality. Two philosophies of last-line defense.
But when these systems open fire at extreme rates, which one actually costs more per shot?
Watch until the end to see the Cost Per Shot comparison.

👇 Which CIWS would you trust — AK-630M or Goalkeeper?
💬 Comment your choice below.

📊 Subscribe for more military comparisons, naval warfare analysis, and defense economics.

#military
#navy
#ciws
#costpershot
#ak630
#goalkeeper
#navalwarfare
#missiledefense
#modernwarfare
#militarytechnology
#weaponcomparison
#militaryanalysis
#militarycomparison
#defenseanalysis
#militaryequipment
#weaponanalysis
#battlefield
#defensetechnology
#weaponsystems
#modernmilitary
#feed
#shorts

Видео AK-630M vs Goalkeeper (Cost Per Shot Comparison | CIWS) канала Tactical Expenditure