Solving the PostgreSQL Join Problem: Accurate Summation and Counting of Records

A comprehensive guide to resolving issues with `PostgreSQL` joins, ensuring accurate sum values and counts in joined tables.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/77764556/ asked by the user 'Murat Yıldız' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1604048/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/77766099/ provided by the user 'Murat Yıldız' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1604048/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: PostgreSQL multiplies columns when joining two tables

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Navigating PostgreSQL Join Issues: Accurate Calculation of Sums and Counts

When dealing with relational databases, joins are a powerful tool. However, they can sometimes lead to unexpected results, especially when aggregating data. One common challenge developers face in PostgreSQL is obtaining accurate sums and counts when joining tables. In this post, we'll explore a specific scenario involving two tables and provide a clear solution to achieve the desired results.

The Problem: Unexpected Results with Joins

Consider two tables in our PostgreSQL database: a parent table containing financial data and a child table detailing departmental records. Here’s the simplified structure:

Parent Table

| id | name | amount | year |
|------|-------|--------|------|
| 101 | Henry | 300 | 2020 |
| 102 | Carol | 100 | 2020 |
| 103 | Tom | 900 | 2020 |

Child Table

| id | parent_id | department |
|----|-----------|------------|
| 1 | 101 | finance |
| 2 | 101 | hr |
| 3 | 101 | it |
| 4 | 102 | support |

In the scenario presented, the initial attempt to join these tables and calculate the sum of the amount field resulted in an unexpected sum of 1900 instead of the accurate 1300. This discrepancy arose because the joining process counted the parent records multiple times due to the multiple child records associated with each parent.

Initial Query Attempt

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This query mistakenly multiplies the amount because it includes multiple channels associated with a single parent. The challenge is how to sum the amounts correctly while getting an accurate count of all child records.

The Solution: Separate Subqueries for Reliable Results

After analyzing the situation, a more effective query was devised. The solution involves using separate subqueries for accurately summing the amounts while counting the child records distinctly:

The Working Query

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Solution

Subquery for Sum: The inner subquery (SELECT SUM(amount) FROM parent WHERE year = 2020) computes the total amount from the parent table without the influence of child record duplication.

Counting Child Records: The outer query merely counts all records from the child table using COUNT(c.id), ensuring that it retrieves all child IDs related to any parent.

Benefits of this Approach

Accuracy: By separating the concerns of aggregation (sum) and counting, the query prevents unwanted repetition in calculations.

Clarity: The use of subqueries improves readability and helps others understand the intent and logic behind the query operations.

Performance: Depending on data size, this method may perform better as it avoids the complexities of joining with aggregate functions.

Conclusion

When working with joins in PostgreSQL, ensuring accurate sums and counts often requires thoughtful consideration. By leveraging subqueries as shown, developers can mitigate issues of duplication and achieve reliable data insights. Applying these techniques will save you time and reduce frustration when troubleshooting database queries.

For all the database enthusiasts out there, I hope this explanation clears up some common pitfalls encountered with joins. If you have further questions or comments, feel free to share them below!

Видео Solving the PostgreSQL Join Problem: Accurate Summation and Counting of Records канала vlogize