Nuclear Superiority and Nuclear Crisis Outcomes | CGSR Seminar
Matthew Kroenig of Georgetown University and Brent Scowcroft Center deliver the lecture "Nuclear superiority and nuclear crisis outcomes" at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Center for Global Security Research.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here do not represent LLNL or the U.S. government.
Видео Nuclear Superiority and Nuclear Crisis Outcomes | CGSR Seminar канала Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here do not represent LLNL or the U.S. government.
Видео Nuclear Superiority and Nuclear Crisis Outcomes | CGSR Seminar канала Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
19 августа 2014 г. 23:28:45
01:10:33
Другие видео канала
Dr. Ira Helfand - The Growing Danger of Nuclear War and What We Can Do About ItStockpile Stewardship: How we ensure the nuclear deterrent without testingMatthew Bunn - Nuclear Risks, Part 1: The Problem of Nuclear and Radiological TerrorismManufacturing at Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryCGSR Seminar Series | A Map with No Edges: Ramifications of Future Operating EnvironmentsCGSR Seminar Series | Artificial Intelligence and Crisis Decision-makingAn Inside Look at LLNL's Machinist Apprenticeship ProgramDeveloping scientific code on the world’s fastest computers at LLNLThe Logic of American Nuclear StrategyAdvancing Healthcare with Data ScienceThe History of the National Atmospheric Research and Advisory CenterCGSR Seminar Series | Toward a More Proliferated World?360 video tour of the world's largest laserThe Logic of American Nuclear Strategy: Why Strategic Superiority MattersExascale’s impact on national nuclear securityExascale and designing therapeutics for cancer and infectious diseaseCGSR Author Series | Reducing Global Nuclear Risk: Strategy for Cooperative Engagement by Lewis DunnFlux: Enabling Modern Supercomputing WorkflowsWhat is exascale and how will El Capitan benefit scientists?CGSR Author Series | Technical Issues in the CTBT Ratification Debate