Загрузка страницы

A RE-INTERPRETATION OF THE LATE BRONZE AGE CHRONOLOGY AT BEYCESULTAN BASED ON C-14 DATING

The excavations by James Mellaart and Seton Lloyd at Beycesultan in central western Anatolia during the 1950s revealed an extensive settlement with continuous habitation layers from the Chalcolithic to the Late Bronze Age. Beycesultan thus became (after Troy) the second Bronze Age settlement in western Asia Minor to be excavated on a large scale. In the course of the re-newed investigations led by Eşref Abay after 2007, ten C-14 samples were taken from layers 5b-5a/II-Ib. Their analyses now lead to a re-evaluation of Beycesultan’s chronology.Based on ceramic typology, Mellaart attributed layer Ib (5a) after the 12th cent. and level II (5b) to the 13th cent. (all BCE). The C-14 samples, however, now suggest that the layers 5a/Ib and 5b/II, which had been placed between ca 1100 and 1300, ought to be dated to 1830-1685 at the earliest and (even more likely) 1530-1410 at the latest.This change in dates for two Late Bronze Age layers has major repercussions for the interpretation of the site. Using the Hittite texts, it is now possible to contextualize the site in a wider geo-political framework vis-à-vis Arzawa and Hatti. What is more, a big percentage of the 24 newly introduced pottery shapes of layer 5a/Ib are now synchronous with ceramic styles in the Hittite core region. Furthermore, it can be shown that the big fire that destroyed layer 5b/II can now be plausibly placed in the period of the so-called Assuwan confederacy – and it may thus reflect a military advance under the rule of Tudḫaliya I/II.
Author(s): Kourkoulakos, Antonios (University of Münster)

Видео A RE-INTERPRETATION OF THE LATE BRONZE AGE CHRONOLOGY AT BEYCESULTAN BASED ON C-14 DATING канала European Association of Archaeologists
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Введите заголовок:

Введите адрес ссылки:

Введите адрес видео с YouTube:

Зарегистрируйтесь или войдите с
Информация о видео
3 апреля 2021 г. 18:00:04
00:14:22
Другие видео канала
WOODLANDS VS. SETTLEMENTS: RELICTS OF RUSSIAN LATE MEDIEVAL LANDSCAPEWOODLANDS VS. SETTLEMENTS: RELICTS OF RUSSIAN LATE MEDIEVAL LANDSCAPEGLASS AND AMBER ARTIFACTS AS AN INDICATOR OF LOCAL AND GLOBAL CHANGESGLASS AND AMBER ARTIFACTS AS AN INDICATOR OF LOCAL AND GLOBAL CHANGESTHE ILLUSION OF IMMATERIALITY: TOWARDS A POSTHUMAN VIEW ON MATERIAL ABSENCE ANDDIGITAL PRESENCETHE ILLUSION OF IMMATERIALITY: TOWARDS A POSTHUMAN VIEW ON MATERIAL ABSENCE ANDDIGITAL PRESENCECOMBING THE DATA: ASSESSING THE UTILITY OF ‘WEAVING’ COMBS IN THE TEXTILE PRODUCTION SEQUENCECOMBING THE DATA: ASSESSING THE UTILITY OF ‘WEAVING’ COMBS IN THE TEXTILE PRODUCTION SEQUENCETHE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE RESCUE OF OUR ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGETHE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE RESCUE OF OUR ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGEREFERENCING, RE-USING, REPURPOSING: EARLY MEDIEVAL ACTIVITY AT BRONZE AGE HILLFORTS IN IRELANDREFERENCING, RE-USING, REPURPOSING: EARLY MEDIEVAL ACTIVITY AT BRONZE AGE HILLFORTS IN IRELANDURNFIELD OR NON-URNFIELD? - SO-CALLED LOWER ODER VERSION OF LUSATIAN CULTUREURNFIELD OR NON-URNFIELD? - SO-CALLED LOWER ODER VERSION OF LUSATIAN CULTUREA MARITIME PALIMPSEST LANDSCAPE: HISTORIC EXPLOITATION OF SCOTLAND’S COASTAL RESOURCESA MARITIME PALIMPSEST LANDSCAPE: HISTORIC EXPLOITATION OF SCOTLAND’S COASTAL RESOURCESANIMAL SYMBOLISM ON SEVENTH CENTURY IRON BELT FITTINGS AND THE CHRISTIANISATION OF MEROVINGIAN GAULANIMAL SYMBOLISM ON SEVENTH CENTURY IRON BELT FITTINGS AND THE CHRISTIANISATION OF MEROVINGIAN GAULNETWORK PATTERNS: A CASE STUDY OF THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC SITES IN THE NORTHERN BLACK SEA REGIONNETWORK PATTERNS: A CASE STUDY OF THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC SITES IN THE NORTHERN BLACK SEA REGIONTHE GREATEST HEALTH PROBLEM OF THE MIDDLE AGES?THE GREATEST HEALTH PROBLEM OF THE MIDDLE AGES?ESTABLISHING THE POTENTIAL OF 3D MODELLING AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS FOR INTERPRETING WILD PLANTSESTABLISHING THE POTENTIAL OF 3D MODELLING AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS FOR INTERPRETING WILD PLANTSThe Relevance of Merging Fields - What Archaeometry Can’t TellThe Relevance of Merging Fields - What Archaeometry Can’t TellEXAMINING AN EARLY MEDIEVAL CRANNOG’S RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIOPOLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGESEXAMINING AN EARLY MEDIEVAL CRANNOG’S RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIOPOLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGESSPATIAL UNCERTAINTY IN PREHISTORYSPATIAL UNCERTAINTY IN PREHISTORYREDISCOVERING THE ANTONINE WALL – MAKING OUR ROMAN HERITAGE MATTERREDISCOVERING THE ANTONINE WALL – MAKING OUR ROMAN HERITAGE MATTERINTRODUCTION: THE LUWIANS AND THEIR CONTEMPORARIES IN LATE BRONZE AGE WESTERN ASIA MINORINTRODUCTION: THE LUWIANS AND THEIR CONTEMPORARIES IN LATE BRONZE AGE WESTERN ASIA MINORINTRODUCTION: SCIENTIFIC DATING AND CENTRAL - WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN PREHISTORYINTRODUCTION: SCIENTIFIC DATING AND CENTRAL - WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN PREHISTORYEUROPE IN TRANSITION: MAPPING CHANGING FUNERARY RITES IN THE SIXTH EIGHTH CENTURIESEUROPE IN TRANSITION: MAPPING CHANGING FUNERARY RITES IN THE SIXTH EIGHTH CENTURIESCHANGES IN URBAN HOUSEHOLDS IN AD 950-1150 TRONDHEIM, NORWAYCHANGES IN URBAN HOUSEHOLDS IN AD 950-1150 TRONDHEIM, NORWAY
Яндекс.Метрика