Here's how markets have historically reacted to presidential election results
Ed Clissold, chief U.S. strategist at Ned Davis Research Group, has studied how markets have reacted to presidential election results in the United States for over a century. He joins "Squawk Box" to explain his findings.
Видео Here's how markets have historically reacted to presidential election results канала CNBC Television
Видео Here's how markets have historically reacted to presidential election results канала CNBC Television
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Six states that could swing the 2020 presidential electionStrategist on which stocks could do well regardless of election outcomeThe Electoral College, explainedWhat Happens If Trump Loses The Election And Refuses To Concede? | NBC News NOWCalSTRS Chris Ailman: We've seen market momentum 'run out of gas'Jim Cramer on what Trump hinting at firing Fauci could mean for marketsElection 2020 and investing: Looking at possible stock market outcomesBusiness brace for potential unrest following presidential election outcomes'Overwhelming Enthusiasm': Latino Voters Gear Up For Election Day | Morning Joe | MSNBC2020 Election: The bull market in equites almost surely will continue,' says economistWhat if a US presidential candidate refuses to concede after an election? | Van JonesMarkets have been discounting a Blue Wave, says Stifel CEOFinal CBS News Battleground Tracker before election shows early voters prefer BidenTwo tax policy experts debate the how Biden's tax proposals affect the economyRoad to 270: Polls show Trump leading in only 2 battleground states'We think we're in the early stages of a bull market,' says Keith LernerClarity is what the market needs, no matter the election outcome: CIOPennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf: Things feel different from 2016Full Pollsters: Trump Has 'Never Had A Positive Job Rating' in NBC News / WSJ Poll | Meet The PressAllianz's El-Erian on what the U.S. can learn from Europe reimplementing lockdowns