Officers Refuse To Investigate Crime: A Deep Dive
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Facebook: https://bit.ly/3fKIZF8
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Audit the Audit 2: http://bit.ly/2CD2b6j
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video:
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwv35xL9AFI
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlEBheo1EYw
Pinole Police Department response video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aazcJKfNjc0
Bay Area Transparency reaction video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYBbF5wzlpo
Bay Area Transparency’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2ihfkymxFFFrfc0kTy7q3w
Pinole Police Department’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9PRmfTmOZcAUvjbN97IC4A
Sources:
Adams v. Williams: https://bit.ly/37bgdMm
Illinois v. Wardlow: https://bit.ly/3rpkVxE
Alabama v. White: https://bit.ly/376GOtM
Florida v. JL: https://bit.ly/3u0zqKz
Article from the department: https://bit.ly/3rOcKv6
Other articles covering the same story:
https://fxn.ws/3rThUWJ
https://bit.ly/3b3JwSd
https://bit.ly/374XxNZ
Kansas v. Glover: https://bit.ly/3b28voD
People v. Casares: https://bit.ly/3d3twlL
People v. Cooper: https://bit.ly/3aZCRZ5
Jeffrey Crapko’s article: https://bit.ly/3beMNOH
Wilson v. Arkansas: https://bit.ly/3rI0Qm8
Hudson v. Michigan: https://bit.ly/3beS7Sb
California Penal Code 830.10: https://bit.ly/3beSaxl
Pinole PD policy manual: https://bit.ly/3rI1jEU
United States v. Sharpe: https://bit.ly/3rReK5t
United States v. Place: https://bit.ly/3aU9lUA
The Bane Act: https://bit.ly/3b1pUOw
California Penal Code 148(g): https://bit.ly/3tLUkwC
Sir Robert Peel’s principles: https://bit.ly/3rN04V1
Видео Officers Refuse To Investigate Crime: A Deep Dive канала Audit the Audit
Facebook: https://bit.ly/3fKIZF8
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Audit the Audit 2: http://bit.ly/2CD2b6j
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video:
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwv35xL9AFI
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlEBheo1EYw
Pinole Police Department response video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aazcJKfNjc0
Bay Area Transparency reaction video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYBbF5wzlpo
Bay Area Transparency’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2ihfkymxFFFrfc0kTy7q3w
Pinole Police Department’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9PRmfTmOZcAUvjbN97IC4A
Sources:
Adams v. Williams: https://bit.ly/37bgdMm
Illinois v. Wardlow: https://bit.ly/3rpkVxE
Alabama v. White: https://bit.ly/376GOtM
Florida v. JL: https://bit.ly/3u0zqKz
Article from the department: https://bit.ly/3rOcKv6
Other articles covering the same story:
https://fxn.ws/3rThUWJ
https://bit.ly/3b3JwSd
https://bit.ly/374XxNZ
Kansas v. Glover: https://bit.ly/3b28voD
People v. Casares: https://bit.ly/3d3twlL
People v. Cooper: https://bit.ly/3aZCRZ5
Jeffrey Crapko’s article: https://bit.ly/3beMNOH
Wilson v. Arkansas: https://bit.ly/3rI0Qm8
Hudson v. Michigan: https://bit.ly/3beS7Sb
California Penal Code 830.10: https://bit.ly/3beSaxl
Pinole PD policy manual: https://bit.ly/3rI1jEU
United States v. Sharpe: https://bit.ly/3rReK5t
United States v. Place: https://bit.ly/3aU9lUA
The Bane Act: https://bit.ly/3b1pUOw
California Penal Code 148(g): https://bit.ly/3tLUkwC
Sir Robert Peel’s principles: https://bit.ly/3rN04V1
Видео Officers Refuse To Investigate Crime: A Deep Dive канала Audit the Audit
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Locksmith ripoffs: Hidden camera investigation (Marketplace)Officer Gets Mad After Issuing Questionable CommandsMichigan Police Sergeant Doesn't Know The LawSergeant Demoted After Unlawful ArrestThe Reveal | Qualified Immunity, Police Impunity Ep. 73OFFICER ARRESTS CRIME VICTIM FOR BEING EMOTIONALOfficers Enforce Non-Existent LawsENTIRE FAMILY ARRESTED FOR REFUSING INSPECTIONPolice Chief Resigns After Detaining Business OwnerArkansas Officer Detains Judge's SonArrested For Wearing a Helmet in Public - $250,000 Settlement RejectedWoman Goes Irate Over Questionable Traffic TicketOfficers Detain Army Staff SergeantPulled Over For Driving Too SafelyDetained For Helping a Friend MoveOFFICER COSTS THE CITY $75,000 OVER RACIAL PROFILINGPolice Chief Swiftly Fired For MisconductOFFICER MAKES UP LAWS TO ENFORCEMan Catches Officer Trespassing and Orders Him to LeaveDUI CHECKPOINT REFUSAL FIRST TIME AUDITOR