- Популярные видео
- Авто
- Видео-блоги
- ДТП, аварии
- Для маленьких
- Еда, напитки
- Животные
- Закон и право
- Знаменитости
- Игры
- Искусство
- Комедии
- Красота, мода
- Кулинария, рецепты
- Люди
- Мото
- Музыка
- Мультфильмы
- Наука, технологии
- Новости
- Образование
- Политика
- Праздники
- Приколы
- Природа
- Происшествия
- Путешествия
- Развлечения
- Ржач
- Семья
- Сериалы
- Спорт
- Стиль жизни
- ТВ передачи
- Танцы
- Технологии
- Товары
- Ужасы
- Фильмы
- Шоу-бизнес
- Юмор
The Submarines America Promised But Can't Build
America has 49 nuclear-powered attack submarines. Right now, around 18 of them can't leave port — tied up waiting for repairs the shipyards can't get to. In 2021, under AUKUS, the United States promised to sell Australia some of its newest boats. On current production, it can't build them without drawing down a fleet that's already a third sidelined.
This deep-dive is about the gap between the promise and the steel: can the US submarine industrial base deliver AUKUS Pillar One — the boats — without gapping its own attack-submarine fleet? And what would a visible slip signal across the Indo-Pacific?
A strategic deep-dive from Iron Command. Defence economics, not hardware. Every load-bearing figure is graded for source reliability (NATO Admiralty System, A–F) — full source list below.
— CHAPTERS —
0:00 49 submarines, 18 can't leave port
0:55 The framework: throughput, not intent
1:55 The fleet you can't use
3:25 The production-line gap
5:25 It's the yards, not the money
7:15 Why money won't fix it fast
9:05 What a slip signals to Beijing
10:25 The hand-over, and the exit clause
11:25 The opportunity cost: boats counted twice
12:40 What's next: three scenarios
14:20 The assessment
15:20 Go deeper
— THE NUMBERS (assessed 21 May 2026) —
• 1.3 Virginia-class submarines delivered per year today
• 2.0/yr target — slipped from 2028 to 2032 (CNO Adm. Caudle)
• 2.33/yr + 1 Columbia/yr needed to honour AUKUS without drawing down the US fleet
• ~$9.8bn US + $3.0bn Australian into the submarine industrial base — build rate still ~1.3/yr
• ~250,000 workers needed this decade; Electric Boat's 2025 hiring goal cut to ~3,050
— WHAT WOULD CHANGE MY MIND —
Sustained Virginia delivery past 1.5 boats/year by 2027, or a funded second submarine yard breaking ground. Absent those two things, the structural read holds. One caveat I'll flag plainly: the ~200× China figure is shipbuilding capacity by tonnage, from a 2023 ONI slide the Navy itself calls non-definitive — it is NOT a 200-to-1 warship count.
— SOURCES, GRADED (NATO Admiralty System; A = completely reliable … F = cannot be judged) —
[A] USNI News — Virginia build rate ~1.3/yr; 2.33/yr + 1 Columbia for AUKUS; CNO Adm. Caudle says 2/yr by 2032 (12 May 2026)
[A] USNI News — U.S. Navy FY2026 30-Year Shipbuilding Plan (11 May 2026)
[A] USNI News — Navy to Inactivate USS Boise After $1.6B Repair Effort (10 Apr 2026)
[A] USNI News — First Columbia-class SSBN tracking to 2028 delivery; Navy's #1 shipbuilding priority
[A] Congressional Research Service — Virginia-class Program & AUKUS Pillar 1 (RL32418): 2.33/yr requirement; ~$9.8bn submarine industrial base
[A] U.S. Government Accountability Office — ~$4.2bn spent over a decade supporting attack subs that couldn't deploy
[B] Naval News — "U.S. Navy goes All In on Submarines"; +$6.2bn to the industrial base (14 May 2026)
[B] Breaking Defense — Australia A$62.6bn / US$45.2bn defence budget, AUKUS ramp (12 May 2026)
[B] Breaking Defense — Australia's ~US$7.8bn Collins-class life extension (20 May 2026)
[B] The War Zone — ONI 2023 slide on China's shipbuilding capacity (~200×, tonnage; non-definitive)
[C] National Defense Magazine — Submarine workforce: ~250k needed this decade; EB 2025 goal cut to ~3,050
[C] National Security Journal — ~40% of US attack submarines out of service for maintenance
[C] UK Defence Journal — UK industrial role in AUKUS: Babcock/Rosyth build US submarine components
— GO DEEPER —
The full assessment — every figure graded — is in this week's Pacific Brief: https://ironcommand.co
If you allocate capital or underwrite risk against the Indo-Pacific, that's the work Iron Command Advisory does: https://ironcommand.co
— ABOUT —
Iron Command is led by Ben Brand, a former British Army intelligence analyst. We assess Indo-Pacific defence and industrial risk for people who have to make decisions on it.
#AUKUS #submarines #USNavy #defence #IndoPacific #China #Australia #VirginiaClass #defenceeconomics #nationalsecurity
Видео The Submarines America Promised But Can't Build канала Iron Command
This deep-dive is about the gap between the promise and the steel: can the US submarine industrial base deliver AUKUS Pillar One — the boats — without gapping its own attack-submarine fleet? And what would a visible slip signal across the Indo-Pacific?
A strategic deep-dive from Iron Command. Defence economics, not hardware. Every load-bearing figure is graded for source reliability (NATO Admiralty System, A–F) — full source list below.
— CHAPTERS —
0:00 49 submarines, 18 can't leave port
0:55 The framework: throughput, not intent
1:55 The fleet you can't use
3:25 The production-line gap
5:25 It's the yards, not the money
7:15 Why money won't fix it fast
9:05 What a slip signals to Beijing
10:25 The hand-over, and the exit clause
11:25 The opportunity cost: boats counted twice
12:40 What's next: three scenarios
14:20 The assessment
15:20 Go deeper
— THE NUMBERS (assessed 21 May 2026) —
• 1.3 Virginia-class submarines delivered per year today
• 2.0/yr target — slipped from 2028 to 2032 (CNO Adm. Caudle)
• 2.33/yr + 1 Columbia/yr needed to honour AUKUS without drawing down the US fleet
• ~$9.8bn US + $3.0bn Australian into the submarine industrial base — build rate still ~1.3/yr
• ~250,000 workers needed this decade; Electric Boat's 2025 hiring goal cut to ~3,050
— WHAT WOULD CHANGE MY MIND —
Sustained Virginia delivery past 1.5 boats/year by 2027, or a funded second submarine yard breaking ground. Absent those two things, the structural read holds. One caveat I'll flag plainly: the ~200× China figure is shipbuilding capacity by tonnage, from a 2023 ONI slide the Navy itself calls non-definitive — it is NOT a 200-to-1 warship count.
— SOURCES, GRADED (NATO Admiralty System; A = completely reliable … F = cannot be judged) —
[A] USNI News — Virginia build rate ~1.3/yr; 2.33/yr + 1 Columbia for AUKUS; CNO Adm. Caudle says 2/yr by 2032 (12 May 2026)
[A] USNI News — U.S. Navy FY2026 30-Year Shipbuilding Plan (11 May 2026)
[A] USNI News — Navy to Inactivate USS Boise After $1.6B Repair Effort (10 Apr 2026)
[A] USNI News — First Columbia-class SSBN tracking to 2028 delivery; Navy's #1 shipbuilding priority
[A] Congressional Research Service — Virginia-class Program & AUKUS Pillar 1 (RL32418): 2.33/yr requirement; ~$9.8bn submarine industrial base
[A] U.S. Government Accountability Office — ~$4.2bn spent over a decade supporting attack subs that couldn't deploy
[B] Naval News — "U.S. Navy goes All In on Submarines"; +$6.2bn to the industrial base (14 May 2026)
[B] Breaking Defense — Australia A$62.6bn / US$45.2bn defence budget, AUKUS ramp (12 May 2026)
[B] Breaking Defense — Australia's ~US$7.8bn Collins-class life extension (20 May 2026)
[B] The War Zone — ONI 2023 slide on China's shipbuilding capacity (~200×, tonnage; non-definitive)
[C] National Defense Magazine — Submarine workforce: ~250k needed this decade; EB 2025 goal cut to ~3,050
[C] National Security Journal — ~40% of US attack submarines out of service for maintenance
[C] UK Defence Journal — UK industrial role in AUKUS: Babcock/Rosyth build US submarine components
— GO DEEPER —
The full assessment — every figure graded — is in this week's Pacific Brief: https://ironcommand.co
If you allocate capital or underwrite risk against the Indo-Pacific, that's the work Iron Command Advisory does: https://ironcommand.co
— ABOUT —
Iron Command is led by Ben Brand, a former British Army intelligence analyst. We assess Indo-Pacific defence and industrial risk for people who have to make decisions on it.
#AUKUS #submarines #USNavy #defence #IndoPacific #China #Australia #VirginiaClass #defenceeconomics #nationalsecurity
Видео The Submarines America Promised But Can't Build канала Iron Command
AUKUS AUKUS submarines Virginia-class submarine US Navy submarines submarine industrial base US shipbuilding crisis China shipbuilding Indo-Pacific security Collins-class Columbia-class submarine USS Boise defence economics naval strategy attack submarine fleet Pillar One Australia submarines Electric Boat Newport News naval shipbuilding defence analysis Iron Command Pacific Brief geopolitics deterrence SSN-AUKUS
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
30 мая 2026 г. 21:00:27
00:22:43
Другие видео канала
