- Популярные видео
- Авто
- Видео-блоги
- ДТП, аварии
- Для маленьких
- Еда, напитки
- Животные
- Закон и право
- Знаменитости
- Игры
- Искусство
- Комедии
- Красота, мода
- Кулинария, рецепты
- Люди
- Мото
- Музыка
- Мультфильмы
- Наука, технологии
- Новости
- Образование
- Политика
- Праздники
- Приколы
- Природа
- Происшествия
- Путешествия
- Развлечения
- Ржач
- Семья
- Сериалы
- Спорт
- Стиль жизни
- ТВ передачи
- Танцы
- Технологии
- Товары
- Ужасы
- Фильмы
- Шоу-бизнес
- Юмор
How to choose analysis method: XRF, LIBS or OES across processing stages.
Full episode: How to select the right analyzer for industrial tasks. Comparison of XRF, LIBS and OES methods. Watch: https://youtu.be/GWI06_el_Mk
In this episode we introduce a structured approach to selecting analytical methods based on three key dimensions: process stage, element range and physical measurement principles.
The discussion outlines a practical “selection matrix” that helps determine which analytical technology — XRF, LIBS or optical emission spectroscopy (OES) — is most suitable for a given task.
The first dimension is the stage of the process: field exploration, mining operations, mineral processing or metallurgy. Each stage imposes its own requirements in terms of speed, mobility, accuracy and operating conditions.
The second dimension is the range of chemical elements, from light to heavy. Different analytical methods have varying capabilities depending on atomic number and measurement conditions.
Within this framework, XRF is typically the preferred method for detecting elements from calcium to uranium, especially in field applications and metallurgical analysis where speed, reliability and mobility are required.
The discussion highlights that method selection must always consider the intersection of these factors rather than relying on a single criterion.
This video is intended for engineers, geologists, metallurgists and specialists involved in selecting analytical technologies across different stages of industrial processes.
► Social media and projects of the guests:
Website of SOXRF: https://soxrf.com
► Subscribe to the channels:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@llctechade
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/soxrf-analyzer
#XRF #LIBS #OES #elementalanalysis #processcontrol #industrialanalytics #miningtechnology #metallurgy #geometallurgy #analyticalequipment #engineering #operationalefficiency #equipmentselection #automation #datadrivendecisions #processoptimization #miningindustry #science #spectrometry #industrialinnovation #ArsenyTrushin
Видео How to choose analysis method: XRF, LIBS or OES across processing stages. канала LLC Techade
In this episode we introduce a structured approach to selecting analytical methods based on three key dimensions: process stage, element range and physical measurement principles.
The discussion outlines a practical “selection matrix” that helps determine which analytical technology — XRF, LIBS or optical emission spectroscopy (OES) — is most suitable for a given task.
The first dimension is the stage of the process: field exploration, mining operations, mineral processing or metallurgy. Each stage imposes its own requirements in terms of speed, mobility, accuracy and operating conditions.
The second dimension is the range of chemical elements, from light to heavy. Different analytical methods have varying capabilities depending on atomic number and measurement conditions.
Within this framework, XRF is typically the preferred method for detecting elements from calcium to uranium, especially in field applications and metallurgical analysis where speed, reliability and mobility are required.
The discussion highlights that method selection must always consider the intersection of these factors rather than relying on a single criterion.
This video is intended for engineers, geologists, metallurgists and specialists involved in selecting analytical technologies across different stages of industrial processes.
► Social media and projects of the guests:
Website of SOXRF: https://soxrf.com
► Subscribe to the channels:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@llctechade
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/soxrf-analyzer
#XRF #LIBS #OES #elementalanalysis #processcontrol #industrialanalytics #miningtechnology #metallurgy #geometallurgy #analyticalequipment #engineering #operationalefficiency #equipmentselection #automation #datadrivendecisions #processoptimization #miningindustry #science #spectrometry #industrialinnovation #ArsenyTrushin
Видео How to choose analysis method: XRF, LIBS or OES across processing stages. канала LLC Techade
XRF LIBS OES selection matrix analytical method selection mining element range analysis methods process stage analytics mining metallurgy XRF applications field and metallurgy LIBS vs XRF comparison industry optical emission spectroscopy use cases industrial analytics decision framework mining process control analyzers geometallurgy analytical tools elemental analysis selection strategy industrial spectrometry methods comparison analytical equipment methodology
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
7 мая 2026 г. 14:00:09
00:00:48
Другие видео канала





















