Falsifying God w Tyler Vela
According to Theopedia, "God of the Gaps arguments are a discredited and outmoded approach to apologetics, in which a gap in scientific knowledge is used as evidence for the existence of God". ..."well, we don't understand that, so it must be God."
https://www.theopedia.com/god-of-the-gaps
During our debate last March, Tyler Vela, he said, "What would falsify my belief is something like the ability of naturalism or atheism....or any type of materialism to account for the existence of things such as laws of logic, objective morality, the existence of something from nothing, the fine-tuning of the cosmos, specified complexity; where God functions ...as a simple explanation for all of these types of things."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSC5rCevyrY
So we're going to talk about that.
Regarding the notion that God is or could be a scientific explanation:
God functions as an explanation
the Deductive-Nomological Model, a scientific explanation
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-explanation/#DNMod
“the sentences constituting the explanans must be true”
“the explanans must contain at least one “law of nature”
If you like what I do, please consider supporting my efforts.
PATREON► https://www.patreon.com/aronra
PAYPAL► https://www.paypal.me/AronRa
Видео Falsifying God w Tyler Vela канала AronRa
https://www.theopedia.com/god-of-the-gaps
During our debate last March, Tyler Vela, he said, "What would falsify my belief is something like the ability of naturalism or atheism....or any type of materialism to account for the existence of things such as laws of logic, objective morality, the existence of something from nothing, the fine-tuning of the cosmos, specified complexity; where God functions ...as a simple explanation for all of these types of things."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSC5rCevyrY
So we're going to talk about that.
Regarding the notion that God is or could be a scientific explanation:
God functions as an explanation
the Deductive-Nomological Model, a scientific explanation
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-explanation/#DNMod
“the sentences constituting the explanans must be true”
“the explanans must contain at least one “law of nature”
If you like what I do, please consider supporting my efforts.
PATREON► https://www.patreon.com/aronra
PAYPAL► https://www.paypal.me/AronRa
Видео Falsifying God w Tyler Vela канала AronRa
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Correcting the Church of Unlimited Errors 3/3Quran Study Lesson IV - Surah 18The Ra Men podcast EP10 - Did Moses Exist? with D.M. MurdockDebate: Has Christianity Historically Been in Conflict with Science?Why do religious believers hate reality so much?Refuting the Irrefutable Proof of God - part XIX - EpilogueReasoning with a Runaway SkepticFlintstones ArchaeologyAtheist Experience #875 with Matt Dillahunty and Aron RaMythical ManAnother ex-atheist turned CatholicWhy do you believe? Ep3 - SnarleyHob on faithThe Damn CommandmentsGive the Devil His DueApostate Prophet vs Nadir Ahmed: Are there scientific errors in the Qur'an?Why do you believe faith depends on evidence?What is FaithFormer Atheist, now Christian MinisterHovind's Failure to Correct his errors ep1Slavery in the Old Testament with Skylar Fiction and Digital Hammurabi