Загрузка страницы

Genetic History of Europe

Read this before posting comment....

The presented stated is based on mainstream theories, no conspiracy or alternative theories.
However I needed to decide on some controvercies:

- First of all I apologize Western and Southern Europe nations - I treated it very general, I specialize mostly in Germanic, Slavic, Nordic and Balts
- It is finally undecided if in Scandinavia R1B or R1A appeared first, but it doesn't matter: Germanic and Nordic nations contain the mix of I1/R1B/R1A, Nordic nations in proportion: 40/40/20. Germans have more R1B because they absorbed more Celtic tribes
- Blond hair and blue eyes of Nordic people should be propably associated with I1 genes not Indoeuropean genes; Slavic nations have up to 70% Indoeuropean (R1A) genes and in historical sources they are described as brown or red haired
- For Slavs I have chosen allochtonic theory - that they were born from remains of Indoeuropeans in Ukraine; autochtonic theory says they were born on territory of Poland but from genetic point of view it does not matter
- I assumed that Venedi people group were neither Germanic neither Slavic - they were separate branch of Indoeuropean people later absorbed by both groups
- The story ends in 1500 BC: later on complex Germanic, Celtic migrations start and it is very complex do show them on such general map
- Process how Indoeuropean language spreaded is controversial - it is unknow how Romans became Indoeuropean speakers
- Finnic language appeared circa 1500BC however it seems that population was there earlier
Music: ( I needed to remove Wardruna and replace with legal soundtrack, sorry)

Видео Genetic History of Europe канала Lukasz Rzepinski
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Введите заголовок:

Введите адрес ссылки:

Введите адрес видео с YouTube:

Зарегистрируйтесь или войдите с
Информация о видео
13 апреля 2014 г. 18:43:26
00:02:05
Яндекс.Метрика