M87 - Is It Really a Black Hole? - Part 4
Fusion Experts Urge “Much Higher Funding” for LPPFusion - https://lppfusion.com/fusion-experts-urge-much-higher-funding-for-lppfusion/
Please watch LPPFusion’s important new video “Pandemic, Economic Crises and the Energy Density Solution”. https://youtu.be/bPQQROYJHpk
In part 4 of the “Is it Really a Black Hole Series”, LPPFusion (https://lppfusion.com) Chief Scientist Eric J. Lerner explains that most astrophysicists don’t consider the possibility that condensed objects can be plasmoids, with magnetic fields comparable to our greater than their gravitational fields, because they are using a wrong approximation to calculate plasma behavior. That approximation, called “magnetohydrodynamics” or MHD, was invented by plasma physics pioneer Hannes Alfven, who won the Physics Nobel Prize in 1970 for his work. Alfven repeatedly warned astrophysicists that the approximation was only valid in certain conditions, with dense plasma like those in the sun. When his warnings were not heeded, he repeated them strongly in his Nobel address (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1970/alfven/lecture/), (a clear, non-technical presentation), saying that many basic concepts used by astrophysicists “are not applicable to the conditions prevailing in the cosmos…it is only the plasma itself that does not ‘understand’ how beautiful the theories are and absolutely refuses to obey them.” (See p. 3-4 of PDF, with a simple table comparing wrong and right approaches.) For a fuller and more technical discussion, see p.15-17 of Alfven’s 1986 paper (http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2%3A514247/FULLTEXT01.pdf). MHD theory can’t explain the focused beams of energy that emerge from compact objects such as quasars and Herbig-Haro objects, which are ordinary stars in the early stages of formation. These beams are routinely observed produced by plasmoids in our laboratory experiments (https://lppfusion.com), explained by correct plasma theory.
Видео M87 - Is It Really a Black Hole? - Part 4 канала LPPFusion
Please watch LPPFusion’s important new video “Pandemic, Economic Crises and the Energy Density Solution”. https://youtu.be/bPQQROYJHpk
In part 4 of the “Is it Really a Black Hole Series”, LPPFusion (https://lppfusion.com) Chief Scientist Eric J. Lerner explains that most astrophysicists don’t consider the possibility that condensed objects can be plasmoids, with magnetic fields comparable to our greater than their gravitational fields, because they are using a wrong approximation to calculate plasma behavior. That approximation, called “magnetohydrodynamics” or MHD, was invented by plasma physics pioneer Hannes Alfven, who won the Physics Nobel Prize in 1970 for his work. Alfven repeatedly warned astrophysicists that the approximation was only valid in certain conditions, with dense plasma like those in the sun. When his warnings were not heeded, he repeated them strongly in his Nobel address (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1970/alfven/lecture/), (a clear, non-technical presentation), saying that many basic concepts used by astrophysicists “are not applicable to the conditions prevailing in the cosmos…it is only the plasma itself that does not ‘understand’ how beautiful the theories are and absolutely refuses to obey them.” (See p. 3-4 of PDF, with a simple table comparing wrong and right approaches.) For a fuller and more technical discussion, see p.15-17 of Alfven’s 1986 paper (http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2%3A514247/FULLTEXT01.pdf). MHD theory can’t explain the focused beams of energy that emerge from compact objects such as quasars and Herbig-Haro objects, which are ordinary stars in the early stages of formation. These beams are routinely observed produced by plasmoids in our laboratory experiments (https://lppfusion.com), explained by correct plasma theory.
Видео M87 - Is It Really a Black Hole? - Part 4 канала LPPFusion
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Unidentified Kitchen Object- Part 2.1How Focus Fusion Compares to Other Fusion Research ProjectsSyed & Eric explain today's anode marks- Aug 13 '21Unveiling the anode connector busBringing Down the Cost of EnergyFiberoptic Troubleshooting, Sun, Oct 3 '21-part 3Tests of the Expansion of the Universe 2021-2023Experiment Preparations; Thu. July 29 '21 6:04PMFirst Fusion Results Aug 13th - Switches Pains & Progress explainedUnidentified Kitchen Object - Part 2.2Microwave Treatment With Rigid Waveguide FixtureAug 6th Shot 1 - one switch may be iffyThe New Fusion Race - Part 6 - Fusion Race Stats - 2017Experiment Preparations; Thu. July 29 '21 6:05PMFF-2B ICCD ShotsFusion Energy - Might We Finally Break EvenDialogs on the Big Bang Debate: Dr Francesco Sylos-LabiniPresentation by Eric Lerner, LPPFusion to Symposium on Plasma Physics and Technology, PraguePicking up the final stainless steel partsWhy is LPPFusion the Only Group Working on Focus Fusion?Unboxing New Bubble Detectors