What did Bart Ehrman say about Birmingham Qur'an manuscript that upset James White?
The Significance of an Astounding New Discovery
Those of you who follow the news have heard that a truly great manuscript discovery has been made public this week, coming out of the University of Birmingham, England. The university has a very important collection of manuscripts, and for New Testament scholars it is famous for its Institute devoted to the study, analysis, and editing of Gospel manuscripts, an institute headed by my long-time friend and colleague David Parker, indisputably one of the top NT textual scholars in the world.
But the discovery that has been made is not connected to the New Testament. It is connected to the Qur’an. Since 1932 the university has had, among its collected works, a virtually full two page fragment of the Qur’an. Recently they decided to see if they could come up with a (relatively) precise date for these pages. And so they had a carbon-14 dating done. The results are nothing less than astounding.
Let me say that carbon-14 dating is indeed a science, but it’s not a highly exact science. It dates organic material based on the deterioration of its carbon-14 isotope, and so can give a range of dates that are statistically determined to be of relative accuracy. Even so. This dating is remarkable. The dating was done by a lab devoted to such things in Oxford. It turns out that there is a 95% chance that these pages were produced between 568 and 645 CE. How good is that? The prophet Mohammed, who (in traditional Islamic teaching) was responsible for producing the Qur’an was engaged in his active ministry in 610-632 CE. These pages may have been produced during his lifetime or in a decade or so later.
In case anyone is missing the significance of that, here is a comparison. The first time we have any two-page manuscript fragment of the New Testament is from around the year 200 CE. That’s 170 years after Jesus’ death in 30 CE. Imagine if we found two pages of text that contain portions, say, of the Sermon on the Mount, in almost exactly the same form as we have them in what is now our Gospel of Matthew, and suppose that these pages received a carbon-14 dating of 30 BCE – 40 CE. Would we be ecstatic, OR WHAT???
Since I am a scholar of early Christianity rather than Islam, this discovery in Birmingham raises all sorts of questions for me that it would not raise for any of my Muslim friends and neighbors. One is a historical question, and one is a question of modern Christian attempts to “prove” the “truth claims” of Christianity.
My historical question is this. If these pages of the Qur’an do indeed show that the text of the Qur’an is virtually the same in, say 630-40 CE as it is in 1630-40 as it is in 2015, that would suggest that Muslims are indeed correct that at least in some circles (it would obviously be impossible to prove that it was true in *all* circles), scribes of the Qur’an simply didn’t change it. The made sure they copied it the same, every time, word for word. Now it *may* be that these newly-dated fragments have significant textual variants from the rest of the manuscript tradition of the Qur’an, and if they do, that too will be immensely interesting. But my sense is that they must not be much, if at all different, otherwise *that* is the story that would be all over the news.
https://ehrmanblog.org/the-significance-of-an-astounding-new-discovery/
Bart D. Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He began his teaching career at Rutgers University, and joined the faculty in the Department of Religious Studies at UNC in 1988, where he has served as both the Director of Graduate Studies and the Chair of the Department.
Professor Ehrman completed his M.Div. and Ph.D. degrees at Princeton Seminary, where his 1985 doctoral dissertation was awarded magna cum laude. An expert on the New Testament and the history of Early Christianity, has written or edited thirty books, numerous scholarly articles, and dozens of book reviews. In addition to works of scholarship, Professor Ehrman has written several textbooks for undergraduate students and trade books for general audiences. Five of his books have been on the New York Times Bestseller list: Misquoting Jesus; God’s Problem; Jesus Interrupted; Forged; and How Jesus Became God. His books have been translated into twenty-seven languages.
Видео What did Bart Ehrman say about Birmingham Qur'an manuscript that upset James White? канала MuslimByChoice
Those of you who follow the news have heard that a truly great manuscript discovery has been made public this week, coming out of the University of Birmingham, England. The university has a very important collection of manuscripts, and for New Testament scholars it is famous for its Institute devoted to the study, analysis, and editing of Gospel manuscripts, an institute headed by my long-time friend and colleague David Parker, indisputably one of the top NT textual scholars in the world.
But the discovery that has been made is not connected to the New Testament. It is connected to the Qur’an. Since 1932 the university has had, among its collected works, a virtually full two page fragment of the Qur’an. Recently they decided to see if they could come up with a (relatively) precise date for these pages. And so they had a carbon-14 dating done. The results are nothing less than astounding.
Let me say that carbon-14 dating is indeed a science, but it’s not a highly exact science. It dates organic material based on the deterioration of its carbon-14 isotope, and so can give a range of dates that are statistically determined to be of relative accuracy. Even so. This dating is remarkable. The dating was done by a lab devoted to such things in Oxford. It turns out that there is a 95% chance that these pages were produced between 568 and 645 CE. How good is that? The prophet Mohammed, who (in traditional Islamic teaching) was responsible for producing the Qur’an was engaged in his active ministry in 610-632 CE. These pages may have been produced during his lifetime or in a decade or so later.
In case anyone is missing the significance of that, here is a comparison. The first time we have any two-page manuscript fragment of the New Testament is from around the year 200 CE. That’s 170 years after Jesus’ death in 30 CE. Imagine if we found two pages of text that contain portions, say, of the Sermon on the Mount, in almost exactly the same form as we have them in what is now our Gospel of Matthew, and suppose that these pages received a carbon-14 dating of 30 BCE – 40 CE. Would we be ecstatic, OR WHAT???
Since I am a scholar of early Christianity rather than Islam, this discovery in Birmingham raises all sorts of questions for me that it would not raise for any of my Muslim friends and neighbors. One is a historical question, and one is a question of modern Christian attempts to “prove” the “truth claims” of Christianity.
My historical question is this. If these pages of the Qur’an do indeed show that the text of the Qur’an is virtually the same in, say 630-40 CE as it is in 1630-40 as it is in 2015, that would suggest that Muslims are indeed correct that at least in some circles (it would obviously be impossible to prove that it was true in *all* circles), scribes of the Qur’an simply didn’t change it. The made sure they copied it the same, every time, word for word. Now it *may* be that these newly-dated fragments have significant textual variants from the rest of the manuscript tradition of the Qur’an, and if they do, that too will be immensely interesting. But my sense is that they must not be much, if at all different, otherwise *that* is the story that would be all over the news.
https://ehrmanblog.org/the-significance-of-an-astounding-new-discovery/
Bart D. Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He began his teaching career at Rutgers University, and joined the faculty in the Department of Religious Studies at UNC in 1988, where he has served as both the Director of Graduate Studies and the Chair of the Department.
Professor Ehrman completed his M.Div. and Ph.D. degrees at Princeton Seminary, where his 1985 doctoral dissertation was awarded magna cum laude. An expert on the New Testament and the history of Early Christianity, has written or edited thirty books, numerous scholarly articles, and dozens of book reviews. In addition to works of scholarship, Professor Ehrman has written several textbooks for undergraduate students and trade books for general audiences. Five of his books have been on the New York Times Bestseller list: Misquoting Jesus; God’s Problem; Jesus Interrupted; Forged; and How Jesus Became God. His books have been translated into twenty-seven languages.
Видео What did Bart Ehrman say about Birmingham Qur'an manuscript that upset James White? канала MuslimByChoice
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
![University of Birmingham Qur’an manuscript among world’s oldest](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/C-HDFiC2boQ/default.jpg)
![Are the Gospels Historically Reliable? The Problem of Contradictions](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AymnA526j9U/default.jpg)
![Adnan Rashid Reads the Quran from the time of the Prophet pbuh](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sQMaK0TP-GI/default.jpg)
![Did Jesus Claim to be God?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TZoC-iPb7uU/default.jpg)
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NLCZogtWKmE/default.jpg)
![Did Jesus claim to be God? Bart Ehrman vs Peter J Williams](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6JU9J0XVlzQ/default.jpg)
![If Jesus Never Called Himself God, How Did He Become One?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Yte-ad6Y31s/default.jpg)
![Bart Ehrman vs. James White Debate P1](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/moHInA9fAsI/default.jpg)
![Theodicy, God and Suffering - A debate between Dinesh D'Souza and Bart Ehrman](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Isg6Kx-3xdI/default.jpg)
![Christian caller CONFRONTS Rabbi Tovia AGAIN: Isn't pilgrimage to Kaaba a form of idolatry?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/L0OaPlyzOis/default.jpg)
![Bart Ehrman Says This about Quran & Birmingham manuscript - REACTION](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Lg2GpVKdiMA/default.jpg)
![Expecting Armageddon: What Does the Book of Revelation Reveal?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wWtoPUK8T5A/default.jpg)
![Ehrman vs Wallace - Can We Trust the Text of the NT?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WRHjZCKRIu4/default.jpg)
![Dr Bart Ehrman and Dr Laurence Brown discuss God, Suffering, and the Purpose of Life](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/czoD-k-A7t0/default.jpg)
![Has the Qur'an Been Perfectly Preserved? - Dr. Bart Ehrman answers](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bh-j76VJnsY/default.jpg)
![What did Bart Ehrman say about Quran & Birmingham manuscript](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-Zois8sGr9Q/default.jpg)
![Discovery of The Oldest Quran Fragments | Dr. Shabir Ally](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EBonpvDgu6I/default.jpg)
![God became Flesh? Priest Questions Rabbi Tovia Singer on the Divinity of the Messiah](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q-K1rU4T2ek/default.jpg)
![Do Muslims Have The Correct Version of Jesus? Dr. @Bart D. Ehrman](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/r1lNj7KXcfA/default.jpg)
![Christian caller CONFRONTS Rabbi Tovia: Why do you say Christianity is idolatry? What about Islam?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XJHZ2UtqWJ4/default.jpg)