Cox v. Pearl Investment Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Cox v. Pearl Investment Co. | 450 P.2d 60 (1969)
In Cox versus Pearl Investment Company, the court pondered whether a plaintiff’s signing a release of liability with one joint tortfeasor meant that the plaintiff gave up the right to sue all other joint tortfeasors who might be liable for the same accident.
Pearl Investment Company owned property that it leased to Goodwill Industries. Audrey Cox fell and hurt herself on this property.
Cox sued Pearl and Goodwill for negligence. Goodwill paid her $2500 in consideration for signing a covenant not to proceed with the suit against it. This release included language stating that Cox reserved the right to sue any other person against whom she might have a claim of damages from the same accident.
At trial, Pearl argued that Cox’s release of her claims against Goodwill also applied to her claim against Pearl. The trial court applied the rule from Price versus Baker, that, quote “the release of one joint tortfeasor is a release of all,” unquote. Ignoring the words of the release, the court dismissed the case. Cox appealed to the Colorado supreme court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/cox-v-pearl-investment-co
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/cox-v-pearl-investment-co
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
Видео Cox v. Pearl Investment Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained канала Quimbee
Cox v. Pearl Investment Co. | 450 P.2d 60 (1969)
In Cox versus Pearl Investment Company, the court pondered whether a plaintiff’s signing a release of liability with one joint tortfeasor meant that the plaintiff gave up the right to sue all other joint tortfeasors who might be liable for the same accident.
Pearl Investment Company owned property that it leased to Goodwill Industries. Audrey Cox fell and hurt herself on this property.
Cox sued Pearl and Goodwill for negligence. Goodwill paid her $2500 in consideration for signing a covenant not to proceed with the suit against it. This release included language stating that Cox reserved the right to sue any other person against whom she might have a claim of damages from the same accident.
At trial, Pearl argued that Cox’s release of her claims against Goodwill also applied to her claim against Pearl. The trial court applied the rule from Price versus Baker, that, quote “the release of one joint tortfeasor is a release of all,” unquote. Ignoring the words of the release, the court dismissed the case. Cox appealed to the Colorado supreme court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/cox-v-pearl-investment-co
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/cox-v-pearl-investment-co
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
Видео Cox v. Pearl Investment Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained канала Quimbee
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Fisher v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedStrawbridge v. Curtiss Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedPeople v. Berry Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedUtility Air Regulatory Group v. E.P.A. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedJames Baird Co. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedSilverthorne Lumber Company v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedThe T.J. Hooper Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedGrimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedCohen v. Cowles Media Co., 457 N.W.2d 199 (1990) Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedCurtis v. Loether Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedChambers v. Maroney Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedCalifornia v. Ciraolo Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedUnited States v. Park Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedSpur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedPrah v. Maretti Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedGruen v. Gruen Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedWinters v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedCrabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedCaperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedYates v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedSweatt v. Painter Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained