I Was Wrong About the Raycon E25

Around two weeks ago, I uploaded a video where I basically accused Raycon of potentially rebranding a product, marketing it and selling it for an abhorrent price. I was speaking about their raycon e25 compared to the Blitzwolf BW FYE5. Which I believed were the same product. On that same video, they reached out and commented that the shell appears very similar but the software and hardware inside the raycon earbuds are not. So, I took that video down. I don’t want to be someone who spreads misinformation. So, to be sure I got the whole truth. I bought both. I got both earbuds right here. And spoiler alert. Raycon was absolutely correct.

0:00 Introduction
0:55 All the differences
2:45 Conclusion
This is going to be a pretty quick video. In short. I was wrong. The shells look near identical, that’s true, I was correct about that but that’s where the similarities end. Here’s what I mean. First the cases have different finishes. One is glossy and one is matte. The Blitzwolf case is somewhat translucent, meaning you can see the earbuds leds when they’re charging through the case. The raycon is solid, with no light shining through. The earbuds sound completely different from each other. The Raycon E25 emphasizes bass and the high ends, while the Blitzwolf FYE5 sounds much more flat in comparison. The battery life on the Blitzwolf earbuds are abysmal at 2 and a half hours at max volume, while the Raycon E25 got me 4 and a half hours at max volume despite the raycon sounding slightly louder at max volume. The Raycon E25 takes a little less than an hour to fully charge the earbuds, and the Blitzwolf takes nearly 2 hours. Even the accessories they come with are different. They both provide a micro usb cable, but the one for the Blitzwolf is significantly longer, but the Raycon E25 provides way more eartips, and they don’t come in a sad little baggy the way the Blitzwolf do. The mics sound different. The E25 does this weird woobly thing when you’re talking. It sounds like you’re on a swing set, swinging back and forth. The Blitzwolf doesn’t have this problem and seems to try and noise gate the background noise away.

So I think these are enough differences to conclude that these are not the same product. The Blitzwolf are overall inferior to the Raycon e25, despite in my opinion, better mic quality over the e25. The Blitzwolf are earbuds I personally would not recommend, in that low end price range. I’d just go for the Enacfire e60, which I’ve had for about a week and am absolutely loving so far. It’s a great value for its price. The verdict on the Raycon E25? I’ll save that for the full review.

So, I was wrong. They are not rebranding products. You could argue they used a similar shell which is true. These are pretty close shape and design wise, but these are not the same product and I was straight up wrong for saying that. I thought I found juicy information and it was not correct. So pro tip. Don’t make accusations about products until you have them both in your hands. Even if it appears that they are the same. They might surprise you. I thought I had a Computer Clan and Lit Mobile type story but I didn’t. I was wrong.

Anyway guys hope this video cleared things up on why I had to remove that video. I don’t think I’m cut out for those “exposed” type videos, I don’t enjoy making them too much and those could be really dangerous and harm reputations especially if I’m wrong. Think I’ll stick to just reviews, I prefer doing reviews anyway. Thanks for understanding guys. And I’ll see you guys next time.

Видео I Was Wrong About the Raycon E25 канала Jimmy Tries World