Action vs. Inaction

From the book "THE GREAT DISCREPANCY" by Boris Kriger
https://boriskriger.com/contradictionofideas/

For those accustomed to a life of action, learning the art of inaction can be as challenging as it is for the habitual non-doer to learn to act. Habits, after all, have a significant influence on our decision-making processes and behavior. Individuals who thrive on activity may find it hard to stay idle, to resist the urge to 'do' constantly. This is because they derive their sense of worth or accomplishment from taking concrete steps, making discernible progress, or effecting palpable change.
On the other hand, those who are more comfortable with inaction may find the prospect of action daunting. This could be because they value contemplation over execution or find comfort in the predictability and safety of non-action. When thrust into situations that require action, they might feel overwhelmed or out of their depth. Hence, pushing the 'doer' towards inaction and the 'non-doer' towards action is like turning the tide—it's a struggle against the familiar, a challenging recalibration of ingrained tendencies. It underscores the notion that action and inaction are not merely choices we make but are often reflections of our ingrained habits and comfort zones.
Knowing when to act and when not to act is very important. It's not just about making a decision, it's more about understanding the situation and the effects our choices could have. Sometimes, we need to take charge and make things happen. Other times, we need to step back and let things play out.
It's not only about choosing between action and inaction, but knowing when to use each one. Acting can lead to change and progress, while not acting can give us time to think and adjust our plans. Both are important ways of dealing with the world's uncertainties.
The skill of timing our actions, and equally, our non-actions, is essential in life. It goes beyond merely choosing an action; it's about grasping the deeper aspects of the situation and the potential outcomes. At times, the best response is to jump in, to intervene, to make things move. On other occasions, the right choice is to hold back, to observe, and to let things naturally unfold.
Think of it not as picking one over the other—action or inaction—but about knowing when each is most effective. Being active can spark changes and drive progress, while being inactive can provide valuable thinking time and allow for better planning. Both methods offer distinct ways to navigate the unpredictable world we live in, ensuring we're equipped for any situation.
Conscious inaction, an intriguing yet underappreciated strategy, has its unique place in the process of decision-making. It offers an alternative path, allowing us to detach, reflect, and assess before rushing headlong into the turmoil of action. Often, the rush towards hasty decisions can lead to suboptimal outcomes, inviting unnecessary complications. Conscious inaction, on the other hand, champions the wisdom of pause, making room for deeper understanding and patient deliberation.
Moreover, the effectiveness of inaction is not a universal truth but rather situational, contingent upon the circumstances at hand. There are moments when stepping back, allowing the dynamics of the situation to unfold, can yield more profound results than stepping forward. It's about discerning when to act and when to withhold, understanding that sometimes the best action might be inaction. Essentially, it's about navigating the swing of events with a discerning eye, acknowledging that sometimes the power of inaction can outweigh the most well-intentioned, immediate actions.

https://boriskriger.com/
Моб./WhatsApp +1 (705) 571-4325
https://www.facebook.com/boris.kriger
email: boriskriger@gmail.com

Видео Action vs. Inaction канала ALTASPERA