Загрузка страницы

Kill 1 to Save 5? Consequentialism vs. Deontology

Is it ever ok to kill an innocent person? According to Consequentialism, morality is ultimately about doing whatever has the best consequences. But according to Deontology, there are some moral rules that should never be broken. Philosophers Philippa Foot and Judith Jarvis Thomson offer some interesting thought experiments (i.e. hypothetical scenarios) to help us think about these issues. In the famous Trolley Problem example, there's a runaway trolley about to kill five people on the track ahead, but you can divert the trolley so that it hits only one person instead. And in the Transplant Case, there's a surgeon who can murder an innocent person so that he can harvest the organs and save five people from organ failure. Both cases involve killing 1 person to save 5 others.
Media Sources:
Illustrations: https://www.freepik.com (and macrovector)
Music: https://www.purple-planet.com
Sound Effects: https://www.zapsplat.com

Видео Kill 1 to Save 5? Consequentialism vs. Deontology канала Thinking About Stuff
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Введите заголовок:

Введите адрес ссылки:

Введите адрес видео с YouTube:

Зарегистрируйтесь или войдите с
Информация о видео
28 сентября 2020 г. 3:37:23
00:03:27
Яндекс.Метрика