Загрузка...

CISO Guide: Architectural Trust vs. Patchwork Compliance in Automotive Security | Trustonic & Sasken

For Automotive CISOs & Engineering Heads: Unlock why architectural trust beats reactive compliance. Trustonic's Ed Bateman (2B+ devices secured) and Sasken reveal:

• Why secure enclaves (TEE) are non-negotiable post-2024 UN R155 (00:00)
• How to avoid $50M GDPR fines with privacy-by-design (05:15)
• Cutting rework costs by 60% via early security investment (12:40)
• Partner selection: Why 2B+ deployments matter (18:30)
• Your 90-day action plan: Gap assessment → implementation (25:50)

[32:20] Case study: Tier-1 supplier saved $3.8M avoiding late-stage rework
[38:45] Live Q&A: Your top security governance challenges answered

► Explore Trustonic Kinibi:https://www.trustonic.com/webinars/automotive-cyber-security-for-connected-vehicles-today-tomorrow/
► Book Sasken Security Audit: https://www.sasken.com/sasken-product-security

Key Terms:
Automotive CISO Guide, Architectural Trust vs Compliance, Vehicle Cybersecurity Strategy, Secure Enclaves Automotive, TEE Implementation, UN R155 Compliance, GDPR Automotive, Security Gap Assessment, ISO 21434, Automotive Cyber Threats, Zero-Trust Architecture, Hardware-Backed Security, Security Governance, Post-Quantum Cryptography, OEM Security Framework

Featured Experts:
Ed Bateman - Director of Product, Trustonic (20+ yrs | Kinibi OS architect)
Saurabh - Cybersecurity Partnerships, Sasken

Subscribe for more on secure, compliant product development: www.youtube.com/@UC4bueyy_jMJWsmiTokp2l6g

#CISO #AutomotiveSecurity #ArchitecturalTrust #SecureByDesign #Compliance

Видео CISO Guide: Architectural Trust vs. Patchwork Compliance in Automotive Security | Trustonic & Sasken канала Sasken Technologies Ltd.
Яндекс.Метрика

На информационно-развлекательном портале SALDA.WS применяются cookie-файлы. Нажимая кнопку Принять, вы подтверждаете свое согласие на их использование.

Об использовании CookiesПринять