Will People Pay For Access To AI Agents? They Already Are

Will people pay for access to AI agents? They already are, it just doesn't look the way most people imagined back in 2023, when the idea was making an AI version of yourself and charging others to use it.
In this video I talk through why that prediction turned out to be mostly right, using our own agency as the example. Our number one asset is still the people. But our number two asset is our Claude skills, a set of markdown files we've put thousands of hours into building and iterating on.
Every service we run still involves a human. Most of the actual work gets done by Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini, and the assumption is that more of it gets handed to those workflows over time, so the people spend their time on relationships and judgment. So when a client hires us, part of what they're paying for is access to that AI agent.
What I keep running into now is clients asking if they can skip the agency and just get the AI. "Can you train my team on your workflows?" I don't have a clean way to do that yet, and even if I did, I have no idea how I'd price it. On one hand it's a series of markdown files. On the other, the work these agents produce is really good, and we only use AI where it does the job better than a human could.
I don't have the answer. I think it's one of the more interesting open questions for the economy right now: how do you price and sell an AI agent?
#AIagents #AItools #AgencyLife

Видео Will People Pay For Access To AI Agents? They Already Are канала TJ Robertson