Solving Unexpected Responses from the OpenAI GPT-3 API

Discover why you may receive unexpected responses when using the `OpenAI GPT-3 API` in Jupyter Notebook and how to fix it by updating your model.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75969974/ asked by the user 'JoeyC' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1335473/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75977040/ provided by the user 'Rok Benko' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10347145/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: OpenAI GPT-3 API: Why do I get an unexpected response?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Unexpected Responses from the OpenAI GPT-3 API

When using the OpenAI GPT-3 API, particularly in interactive environments like Jupyter Notebook, you may find yourself dealing with unexpected responses. This situation can be baffling, especially when you're working with simple prompts like "Hello, ChatGPT!". In this guide, we'll explore the possible reasons behind these erratic outputs and how to solve this problem effectively.

The Problem: Erratic Responses

You might be wondering, "Why am I getting such weird outputs from a simple prompt?" After executing the following code snippet in Jupyter Notebook, you were greeted with perplexing responses rather than the expected friendly greeting from ChatGPT.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You mentioned that playing with the temperature, frequency_penalty, and presence_penalty didn’t yield the expected results. Instead, you received lengthy texts that seemed entirely unrelated to your simple greeting.

The Solution: Update Your Model

The main issue here arises from the choice of the model you are using. In your code, you've selected the davinci model, which, while capable, is significantly older compared to its successors. The output quality and context relevance can substantially depend on the model in use. Here’s how you can improve your results:

Recommended Models

text-davinci-003: This is the latest and most capable model. It usually generates coherent and contextually relevant responses.

text-davinci-002: An improvement over the older davinci but not as advanced as text-davinci-003.

davinci: This is an older model and might not provide the quality of responses you’re seeking.

Updating Your Code

To leverage the capabilities of the more advanced model, simply replace your model engine declaration to use text-davinci-003. Here’s how your code will look after modification:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This change alone should drastically improve the relevance and quality of the responses you receive.

Conclusion

Dealing with unexpected outputs from the OpenAI GPT-3 API can be a frustrating experience, especially when you expect a simple, coherent response. By ensuring that you're using one of the latest models, such as text-davinci-003, you can significantly enhance the relevance and quality of the generated outputs. Don’t hesitate to incorporate this simple change into your code and experience the difference firsthand!

Implementing this solution will allow you to get more appropriate responses that align with your expectations, making your interaction with the API much smoother and more rewarding.

Видео Solving Unexpected Responses from the OpenAI GPT-3 API канала vlogize