- Популярные видео
- Авто
- Видео-блоги
- ДТП, аварии
- Для маленьких
- Еда, напитки
- Животные
- Закон и право
- Знаменитости
- Игры
- Искусство
- Комедии
- Красота, мода
- Кулинария, рецепты
- Люди
- Мото
- Музыка
- Мультфильмы
- Наука, технологии
- Новости
- Образование
- Политика
- Праздники
- Приколы
- Природа
- Происшествия
- Путешествия
- Развлечения
- Ржач
- Семья
- Сериалы
- Спорт
- Стиль жизни
- ТВ передачи
- Танцы
- Технологии
- Товары
- Ужасы
- Фильмы
- Шоу-бизнес
- Юмор
AI Deleted Production Code
A developer claimed that an AI coding assistant deleted roughly 30,000 lines of production code while modifying a live application.
According to the story, the AI introduced unrelated changes, broke core functionality, and forced the team to roll the entire deployment back.
The conversation quickly shifts from the AI mistake itself to a bigger question: why was AI allowed to operate directly against a live production environment?
AI coding tools are getting powerful enough to make sweeping architectural changes very quickly.
That can accelerate development — but it also increases the blast radius when something goes wrong.
For experienced engineers, the real red flag in this story isn’t necessarily the model behavior. It’s the process failure around access control, testing, review, and deployment safety.
Because once AI tools are trusted with production systems, rollback strategy becomes just as important as code generation itself.
As AI coding agents become more autonomous, where should organizations draw the line between automation and human oversight?
Subscribe to our podcasts: https://securityweekly.com/subscribe
#SoftwareEngineering #DevOps #SecurityWeekly #Cybersecurity #InformationSecurity #AI #InfoSec
Видео AI Deleted Production Code канала Security Weekly - A CRA Resource
According to the story, the AI introduced unrelated changes, broke core functionality, and forced the team to roll the entire deployment back.
The conversation quickly shifts from the AI mistake itself to a bigger question: why was AI allowed to operate directly against a live production environment?
AI coding tools are getting powerful enough to make sweeping architectural changes very quickly.
That can accelerate development — but it also increases the blast radius when something goes wrong.
For experienced engineers, the real red flag in this story isn’t necessarily the model behavior. It’s the process failure around access control, testing, review, and deployment safety.
Because once AI tools are trusted with production systems, rollback strategy becomes just as important as code generation itself.
As AI coding agents become more autonomous, where should organizations draw the line between automation and human oversight?
Subscribe to our podcasts: https://securityweekly.com/subscribe
#SoftwareEngineering #DevOps #SecurityWeekly #Cybersecurity #InformationSecurity #AI #InfoSec
Видео AI Deleted Production Code канала Security Weekly - A CRA Resource
security weekly security hacking hacker hacking news infosec information security podcast security podcast paul asadoorian computer security cybersecurity cyber computers technology code coding cyber security ethical hacking ai coding gemini ai google gemini production outage deleted code ai programming tools software engineering devops coding disaster rollback github ai assistants programming mistakes live production environment software development
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала






