Is it Safe to Rely on Compiler Optimization to Remove Method Calls?

Discover the effectiveness of compiler optimizations in C+ + and learn how to set up a conditional logging system in your application.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68639773/ asked by the user 'whitwhoa' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1609485/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68640096/ provided by the user 'Ext3h' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2879325/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Is it safe to assume that the compiler will remove these method calls?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Is it Safe to Rely on Compiler Optimization to Remove Method Calls?

In the world of software development, particularly when programming in C+ + , optimizing your code for performance without sacrificing readability is a common challenge. One question that often arises is whether developers can safely assume that the compiler will remove certain method calls during the build process—especially for debugging purposes. This question is particularly relevant when setting up logging systems that may be required during development but not in production.

The Problem: Debugging Logger Setup

As developers implement debug logging in applications, they often want to ensure that log statements are present during development but entirely omitted in production builds. The typical approach might involve using preprocessor directives like # ifdef, which can clutter the code with conditional compilation statements. The question here is: Can we rely on the compiler to remove these logger calls when they are not needed?

Consider the following C+ + code snippet, which illustrates an attempt to create a simple logger that includes logging calls only when a specific environment variable (DO_LOG) is defined:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The developer is questioning whether they can depend on the compiler to eliminate the Logger::log("these are words") call altogether if DO_LOG is not defined.

The Solution: Compiler Optimizations Unpacked

Compiler Handling

The answer to the question is: Yes, but with caveats. In many cases and with particular compilers at high optimization levels, the unnecessary logging code can indeed be eliminated. Here are the nuances to understand:

Compiler Inlining: Compilers have sophisticated optimization capabilities, including inlining functions. When it detects that a function is unused, it can remove both the call to the function and its associated overhead.

String Optimization: In the example provided, the string passed to the logging function may benefit from STL (Standard Template Library) optimizations. If the string is short (typically under 24 bytes), it is stored inline within the std::string object, avoiding any heap allocation.

A Practical Example

When you log Logger::log("these are words"), the string goes through construction. If the compiler optimizations kick in correctly, it will eliminate both the construction of the std::string and the log function call.

However, if the log statement includes a more extended string such as Logger::log("these are very long long long long long words"), the string may not be optimized away, and the compiler could struggle to avoid the temporary heap allocation.

A Modern Approach with C+ + 17

Fortunately, modern C+ + offers solutions that enhance performance and reduce unnecessary heap allocations:

Transitioning to std::string_view

Using std::string_view, which does not allocate memory on the heap, is a better approach:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Takeaways

Use std::string_view: This avoids unnecessary allocations and is designed to be lightweight, making it better for performance when logging larger strings.

Mark Functions Static: Declaring logging functions as static eliminates potential optimizations that miss the inlining opportunities.

Optimization Levels Matter: Compilers will behave differently according to optimization levels, and utilizing more advanced compiler settings can significantly affect how effectively they eliminate unused code.

Conclusion

In summary, while you can rely on compilers to eliminate unnecessary method calls in C+ + , it’s prudent to implement modern practices like using std::string_view and marking functions as

Видео Is it Safe to Rely on Compiler Optimization to Remove Method Calls? канала vlogize