👨‍⚖️ FL Bar Rules Amendment, State v. McMahon & State v. Sturdivant | Oct 3, 2011

In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar & State of Florida v. John McMahon & State of Florida v. Sturdivant | Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments — October 3, 2011

Three matters argued before the Florida Supreme Court on October 3, 2011. Andrew Sasso presents on proposed amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. Attorney Helen Viz of the Florida Attorney General's Office argues for the State in McMahon, challenging whether the State may appeal an illegal sentence resulting from sham sentencing proceedings under Florida Statute §924.07. Assistant Attorney General Charmaine Milsaps argues for the State in Sturdivant, urging the court to revisit its Brooks decision limiting felony murder based on aggravated child abuse to multiple-act situations.

Key issues addressed:
- Proposed amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (In Re: Florida Bar Rules)
- Whether the State has the right to appeal an illegal or sham sentence under Florida Statute §924.07 (State v. McMahon)
- Whether a trial court exceeded its role as neutral arbiter by initiating dialogue about sentencing (State v. McMahon)
- Whether aggravated child abuse as the predicate for felony murder is limited to multiple acts of abuse under Brooks (State v. Sturdivant)
- Whether a single act of aggravated child abuse resulting in death can support a felony murder conviction (State v. Sturdivant)

🔗 Florida Rules & Legal Resources: www.floridarules.net

#FloridaBarRules #StatevMcMahon #StatevSturdivant #FelonyMurder #AggravatedChildAbuse #ShamSentencing #FL92407 #FloridaSupremeCourt #FLSupremeCourt #FloridaAppeal

Видео 👨‍⚖️ FL Bar Rules Amendment, State v. McMahon & State v. Sturdivant | Oct 3, 2011 канала Florida Trust, Real Estate, Probate, & Foreclosure